I always wondered.
Why are there not many "records" of Caligula that aren't made-up? Why is that all we hear about these Roman Emperors is how they are insane rapists and pedos? Is it because we've been occupied by the Blood god-worshiping Canaanite Jews since around 500AD and we've been deluded into thinking that their blood god is somehow our savior?
(Meanwhile, the blood-god worshiping Jews aka the Vatican starving people to death for hundreds of years, hiring child soldiers they call knights and paladins and destroying all historical records is glossed over.)
It mirrors what is happening nowadays recently. Tell a lie big enough, it becomes immutable truth. If they can make us believe that Baal and Dionysus is our savior and sheperd, what stops them from making us believe that genders are mere constructs and American presidents are insane racists?
Maybe in your imagination.
Can you tell me which contemporary accounts you have read that make you think so?
Go read Elagabalus and Tiberus's records.
Also I worded it poorly. Doesn't matter the fact that Nero and Domitian were "infamous" for burning synagogues and churches and executing Christians and Jews, though. Which might be the reasons why since they won.
Yeah no shit.
You mention less than a handful of Emperors and claim that "all we hear about these Roman Emperors is how they are insane rapists and pedos". Do you even know how many Eperors there have been?
So if you have a gripe with how a specific Emperor has been portrayed, let's hear it and name your sources.
How about you educate yourself? Let's take the very first Emperor, Augustus.
Who told you that he was an insane rapist and pedo?