It's a huge thing, undeniable. Once you see the evidence, you can;t see unsee it. There are three mud flooded buildings in the city near which I live, and one in the small suburb where my house is.
What's disturbing is that it's not like it's something you only see on the Internet. It's real, right there, in this rando city and suburb. You can't dismiss it like, "That YouTube guy is just a shill! He's working for the Cabal!" And I'll just take it at face value, so to speak, because if the Cabal arranged false evidence that's been there my entire life to fool a handful of people in the far future, we're all fucked anyway.
It's also clear that the Capitol, the White House and the Executive Office Building across the street were all mud flooded, but there is not a single word in the official histories as to when and how this happened. That's disturbing.
If you choose to research this, you'll also open your eyes to events like the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes. If you've never heard of it, you'll think you really should have when you find out that the Mississippi River ran backwards for 3 days after it. If this was part of the war, they successfully rewrote a huge strike, and the weapon was of unimaginable power.
Look up Ewaranon on YT, something like "Lost History of the Flat Earth" .He's disinfo, yes, selling FE, but there's excellent content documenting the reset of the 1800's. Trust me, you'll be heartbroken seeing what has been stolen from us.
Yes, correct, it seems like it finally put an end to the Tartarians.
You can sort of "back into" the weapon argument this way: The mud flood put an end to the Tartarians. All the mud flood history has been virtually eradicated. Do bad guys or good guys eradicate history? Bad guys, right? And who writes history? The victors, of course. So if the bad guys won a war over the Tartarians, and the mud flood ended the Tartarians, it would be quite an astonishing coincidence if the mud flood was a natural disaster and not in fact a weapon.
Two more factors are consistent with this analysis. One is that the mud flood is found at locations all over the globe, and it was almost entirely confined to cities. A natural disaster would leave all kinds of things buried in the soil, not just buildings.
Second, and I admit this is judgement but it's very clear to me, the Tartarian architecture left behind is beyond magnificent. Glorious artistry and craftsmanship beyond compare. Every building is of a type, yet all unique. Even water towers and stables are more beautiful than any building you've ever seen constructed.
So the current rulers, the winners of that war that erased the memory of their enemy, are they creative enough to have made these? Quite the opposite. All architecture, art, music, etc, is increasingly degrading, debased, dehumanizing, disgusting. A civilization of exceeding beauty was destroyed with what we can only imagine was a sort of "doomsday weapon".
This is all really beyond the forefront. I only know of one other researcher working on it: "Korben Dallas", who runs the stolenhistory.org website. IMHO, he's got a lot of things wrong about who "the Controllers" are and how the big picture fits together, but that's going to happen when you're hacking your way through the jungle. Aside from that, his work and the rest of the site are mind-blowing and a gold mine. Wander around there for a while and you'll have a very hard time after that taking any conventional history at face value.
The last time i was active on the site was a few years ago, so surely there have been developments since then, but Dallas was only beginning to see the mud flood as a weapon. No one, including myself, had any speculation as to how it may have worked. You'll develop your own ideas, but a couple of seemingly likely directions can (IMO) be thrown out.
First is the straightforward idea of liquefaction, as in an earthquake. There are indeed a handful of buildings that are tilting, such a the Leaning Tower of Pisa, but all the rest of straight and level. Liquefaction always induces racking and then tilting before collapse and there's no evidence of this in innumerable mud flooded buildings.
Which brings up the concept of "flood" itself. A flood, like a tsunami, would damage buildings, knock them off their foundations, etc, and there's no evidence of that. Fatally, though, there are many mud flood building on flat plains and on top of rises, so it seems there's nowhere from which the mud could have flooded.
Even a heavy precipitation of rocks and dirt does't seem likely, like ejecta from a comet strike or some such. I would think that that would not only collapse the roofs, but take part of the upper walls with them. Again, no evidence.
All of this analysis is just how it appears "to my eyes" at the current time. We're left with perhaps some sort of relatively slow "dust storm" phenomenon. The thing I'd like to look at is the character of the "mud" next to buildings. Is it all fine particulates, or are there sizable rocks and boulders mixed in?
So how did the Tartarians fall to, well, the Satanists that rule us now? It's a big black hole you're trying to draw evidence out of. But I urge you to study the architecture closely: only a noble and magnificent people could have dreamt such wonders, let alone actually created them to stand flawlessly before us centuries later. I have a hard time even imagining what they were like, but it does bring to mind how far we have all fallen or--more fairly to say--been cast down.
But I take the dismay I feel at what has been lost and flip it around to realize that it is just out of reach, barely out of living memory, and that what has fallen may be restored. Take a good look at photos of the "world's fairs" at the end of the 19th Century. Clearly, the societies that built these cities lived in all we need know of an Earthly Paradise.
It's a huge thing, undeniable. Once you see the evidence, you can;t see unsee it. There are three mud flooded buildings in the city near which I live, and one in the small suburb where my house is.
What's disturbing is that it's not like it's something you only see on the Internet. It's real, right there, in this rando city and suburb. You can't dismiss it like, "That YouTube guy is just a shill! He's working for the Cabal!" And I'll just take it at face value, so to speak, because if the Cabal arranged false evidence that's been there my entire life to fool a handful of people in the far future, we're all fucked anyway.
It's also clear that the Capitol, the White House and the Executive Office Building across the street were all mud flooded, but there is not a single word in the official histories as to when and how this happened. That's disturbing.
If you choose to research this, you'll also open your eyes to events like the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes. If you've never heard of it, you'll think you really should have when you find out that the Mississippi River ran backwards for 3 days after it. If this was part of the war, they successfully rewrote a huge strike, and the weapon was of unimaginable power.
Look up Ewaranon on YT, something like "Lost History of the Flat Earth" .He's disinfo, yes, selling FE, but there's excellent content documenting the reset of the 1800's. Trust me, you'll be heartbroken seeing what has been stolen from us.
Yes, correct, it seems like it finally put an end to the Tartarians.
You can sort of "back into" the weapon argument this way: The mud flood put an end to the Tartarians. All the mud flood history has been virtually eradicated. Do bad guys or good guys eradicate history? Bad guys, right? And who writes history? The victors, of course. So if the bad guys won a war over the Tartarians, and the mud flood ended the Tartarians, it would be quite an astonishing coincidence if the mud flood was a natural disaster and not in fact a weapon.
Two more factors are consistent with this analysis. One is that the mud flood is found at locations all over the globe, and it was almost entirely confined to cities. A natural disaster would leave all kinds of things buried in the soil, not just buildings.
Second, and I admit this is judgement but it's very clear to me, the Tartarian architecture left behind is beyond magnificent. Glorious artistry and craftsmanship beyond compare. Every building is of a type, yet all unique. Even water towers and stables are more beautiful than any building you've ever seen constructed.
So the current rulers, the winners of that war that erased the memory of their enemy, are they creative enough to have made these? Quite the opposite. All architecture, art, music, etc, is increasingly degrading, debased, dehumanizing, disgusting. A civilization of exceeding beauty was destroyed with what we can only imagine was a sort of "doomsday weapon".
This is all really beyond the forefront. I only know of one other researcher working on it: "Korben Dallas", who runs the stolenhistory.org website. IMHO, he's got a lot of things wrong about who "the Controllers" are and how the big picture fits together, but that's going to happen when you're hacking your way through the jungle. Aside from that, his work and the rest of the site are mind-blowing and a gold mine. Wander around there for a while and you'll have a very hard time after that taking any conventional history at face value.
The last time i was active on the site was a few years ago, so surely there have been developments since then, but Dallas was only beginning to see the mud flood as a weapon. No one, including myself, had any speculation as to how it may have worked. You'll develop your own ideas, but a couple of seemingly likely directions can (IMO) be thrown out.
First is the straightforward idea of liquefaction, as in an earthquake. There are indeed a handful of buildings that are tilting, such a the Leaning Tower of Pisa, but all the rest of straight and level. Liquefaction always induces racking and then tilting before collapse and there's no evidence of this in innumerable mud flooded buildings.
Which brings up the concept of "flood" itself. A flood, like a tsunami, would damage buildings, knock them off their foundations, etc, and there's no evidence of that. Fatally, though, there are many mud flood building on flat plains and on top of rises, so it seems there's nowhere from which the mud could have flooded.
Even a heavy precipitation of rocks and dirt does't seem likely, like ejecta from a comet strike or some such. I would think that that would not only collapse the roofs, but take part of the upper walls with them. Again, no evidence.
All of this analysis is just how it appears "to my eyes" at the current time. We're left with perhaps some sort of relatively slow "dust storm" phenomenon. The thing I'd like to look at is the character of the "mud" next to buildings. Is it all fine particulates, or are there sizable rocks and boulders mixed in?
So how did the Tartarians fall to, well, the Satanists that rule us now? It's a big black hole you're trying to draw evidence out of. But I urge you to study the architecture closely: only a noble and magnificent people could have dreamt such wonders, let alone actually created them to stand flawlessly before us centuries later. I have a hard time even imagining what they were like, but it does bring to mind how far we have all fallen or--more fairly to say--been cast down.
But I take the dismay I feel at what has been lost and flip it around to realize that it is just out of reach, barely out of living memory, and that what has fallen may be restored. Take a good look at photos of the "world's fairs" at the end of the 19th Century. Clearly, the societies that built these cities lived in all we need know of an Earthly Paradise.