Absolutely, there is zero reason for spinning this "we don't even have any idea how this shit works inside" nonsense. There are literally companies out there whose sole purpose is building in accountability layers into AI and machine learning models in general. One of the reasons, among many, is for legal defense purposes, so that when a machine learning system tells you to give a patient a certain amount of a certain medicine, that decision can be defended later in court, in a manner more reasonable than, "the machine told me to."
So the notion that these thousands of scientists who have put these things together don't even have a framework for understanding the decision trees, everything about it smells exactly like what you're describing, preparation for a planned attack, aka "digital Covid"...
The worst part about this situation is that we have been conditioned to think that the outcome of this quote digital Covid" is going to be a digital ID system for accessing the Internet, which, while horrible in every way, is actually a lot less terrifying than the reality: the actual end result is probably going to be something like Skynet.
I don't think I could point out a single circumstance where AI is not prescribing and dishing up prescriptions. I'm sure there are a number of old fashion doctors that use human intelligence, instead, but I don't know if any.
If you tell a doctor what's wrong with you, he will enter the symptoms into a computer and approximate a diagnosis and treatment plan; all of this is done with machine learning models that are trained on prior patient data.
Absolutely, there is zero reason for spinning this "we don't even have any idea how this shit works inside" nonsense. There are literally companies out there whose sole purpose is building in accountability layers into AI and machine learning models in general. One of the reasons, among many, is for legal defense purposes, so that when a machine learning system tells you to give a patient a certain amount of a certain medicine, that decision can be defended later in court, in a manner more reasonable than, "the machine told me to."
So the notion that these thousands of scientists who have put these things together don't even have a framework for understanding the decision trees, everything about it smells exactly like what you're describing, preparation for a planned attack, aka "digital Covid"...
The worst part about this situation is that we have been conditioned to think that the outcome of this quote digital Covid" is going to be a digital ID system for accessing the Internet, which, while horrible in every way, is actually a lot less terrifying than the reality: the actual end result is probably going to be something like Skynet.
Can you point out in circumstances where AI is already prescribing and dishing up prescriptions? lol
I don't think I could point out a single circumstance where AI is not prescribing and dishing up prescriptions. I'm sure there are a number of old fashion doctors that use human intelligence, instead, but I don't know if any.
If you tell a doctor what's wrong with you, he will enter the symptoms into a computer and approximate a diagnosis and treatment plan; all of this is done with machine learning models that are trained on prior patient data.