b) CONCERN, verb (Latin, to separate, divide)...what if suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore being separated; divided (partial within whole)?
Looking underneath suggested banking and insurance at the perceivable foundation, which the many ignore for the suggestions of the few, who in return gain the consent to racketeer through banking and insurance.
a) implies a viewpoint through the conflict of reason (yes vs no), shaped by consenting to suggested, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
b) the few use suggestion to divide the consenting many into reasoning against each other over the suggested.
Why do you disregard the message
a) MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.]...nature sends perceivable inspiration, those within send suggested information. Consent to the latter represents ignorance of the former, which in return gives those suggesting the opportunity to exploit ignorance by shaping the suggested at will.
b) the few suggest progressivism (towards outcome); hence tempting the many to REG'ARD, verb - "to look towards", while ignoring to adapt to perceivable origin.
c) regard vs disregard represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
give definitions
a) nature communicates itself as perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words (spell-craft) to ignore sound.
b) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore sound for word-based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
c) I take apart the idolatry; revisionism and deliberate contradictions within suggested definitions, while expressing my comprehension about perceivable sound.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within, by, out of and in response to enacting sound as the reacting resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
just odd
Consider....motion (odd) to momentum (even). Then consider being choice within balance (momentum) of motion, hence having the choice to even the odds.
Form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death) represents ones choice to even the odds of dying...
shtick
Perceiving (living) cannot stick to perceivable (process of dying)...suggested can stick to those consenting to hold onto it, which in return tempts them to ignore resisting (living) temptation (dying).
Synonyms for: concerned / concernedly on Thesaurus.com
🍎 Elementary Level
adjective
interested or affected:
concerned citizens.
troubled or anxious:
a concerned look.
having a connection or involvement; participating
What can you tell be about the revisionism done to the definition of "concern" in-between https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/concern and 2023 Thesaurus? While I'm at it...what about the etymology of CON (with, together) + CERNERE (to perceive; comprehend)?
a) as growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) one a) cannot be ensured without ignoring ones position and b) ones choice implies INDIF'FERENT, adjective [Latin indifferens.] - "neutral; not inclined to one side", hence within balance.
b) suggested INSURANCE (ensured against loss) COMPANY (united)...tempts one to ignore perceivable loss (process of dying) divides perceiving growth (living) into units (ones)...
Edit: a bomb implies explosion of whole into partial...what if that already happened to each one (life) within all (inception towards death)?
What if whole (process of dying) puts itself apart (inception) and back together (death) internally/inherently? What if the few tempt the many together with the fear of "exploding apart", which in return allows the few to sustain apartheid, while surrounded by the many?
Do those utilizing "diaspora" seem to be afraid of apartheid?
We should be concerned about both. FSI is coming down uniformly.
a) both (two) or each one?
b) CONCERN, verb (Latin, to separate, divide)...what if suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore being separated; divided (partial within whole)?
What are you doing?
Looking underneath suggested banking and insurance at the perceivable foundation, which the many ignore for the suggestions of the few, who in return gain the consent to racketeer through banking and insurance.
No. Why do you disregard the message, yet give definitions for two words that were used? It's not a bad shtick, just odd.
please don't feed the troll.
You're right. It's a bad habit.
a) implies a viewpoint through the conflict of reason (yes vs no), shaped by consenting to suggested, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
b) the few use suggestion to divide the consenting many into reasoning against each other over the suggested.
a) MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.]...nature sends perceivable inspiration, those within send suggested information. Consent to the latter represents ignorance of the former, which in return gives those suggesting the opportunity to exploit ignorance by shaping the suggested at will.
b) the few suggest progressivism (towards outcome); hence tempting the many to REG'ARD, verb - "to look towards", while ignoring to adapt to perceivable origin.
c) regard vs disregard represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
a) nature communicates itself as perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words (spell-craft) to ignore sound.
b) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore sound for word-based definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
c) I take apart the idolatry; revisionism and deliberate contradictions within suggested definitions, while expressing my comprehension about perceivable sound.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound), hence being within, by, out of and in response to enacting sound as the reacting resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
Consider....motion (odd) to momentum (even). Then consider being choice within balance (momentum) of motion, hence having the choice to even the odds.
Form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death) represents ones choice to even the odds of dying...
Perceiving (living) cannot stick to perceivable (process of dying)...suggested can stick to those consenting to hold onto it, which in return tempts them to ignore resisting (living) temptation (dying).
Synonyms for: concerned / concernedly on Thesaurus.com 🍎 Elementary Level adjective interested or affected: concerned citizens. troubled or anxious: a concerned look. having a connection or involvement; participating
What can you tell be about the revisionism done to the definition of "concern" in-between https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/concern and 2023 Thesaurus? While I'm at it...what about the etymology of CON (with, together) + CERNERE (to perceive; comprehend)?
a) as growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) one a) cannot be ensured without ignoring ones position and b) ones choice implies INDIF'FERENT, adjective [Latin indifferens.] - "neutral; not inclined to one side", hence within balance.
b) suggested INSURANCE (ensured against loss) COMPANY (united)...tempts one to ignore perceivable loss (process of dying) divides perceiving growth (living) into units (ones)...
Edit: a bomb implies explosion of whole into partial...what if that already happened to each one (life) within all (inception towards death)?
What if whole (process of dying) puts itself apart (inception) and back together (death) internally/inherently? What if the few tempt the many together with the fear of "exploding apart", which in return allows the few to sustain apartheid, while surrounded by the many?
Do those utilizing "diaspora" seem to be afraid of apartheid?