Since when did this occur?
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Possibly yes. Funnily it has just been published. Seemingly it conflicts with other data, fertility data.
That's a staggering figure. As bad as cancer. Worse. It is also a disease. If indeed people cannot reproduce.
https://ivi-fertility.com/blog/infertility-in-europe/
I am still trying to understand that global average. Why is it brand new press.
Obviously vaccines play a role. Because it conflicts with data prior to COVID. Straight from the WHO. Unsurprisingly
Straight from the WHOrse's mouth.
Isn't it funny that these clowns will consistently deny anything that scientists say when it doesn't fit their narrative but when it does, will treat it as gospel?
a) how does nature appear (seem)...as perceivable or as suggested? If both, then as which one first?
b) how does nature communicate data (things given)...as perceivable inspiration or as suggested information? If both, then how does nature make suggestions?
c) was there a conflict in perceivable nature before oneself chose a suggested side? If so, then which conflict?
d) what generates "other" and where can other be generated? If energy represents one, then what represents other?
e) what comes first...being "with" others or being "within" nature?