I charitably refuse to insult you personally, just attack your arguments and lack of writing ability as it bears on your inane thesis. However, it's apparent that you're a sad sack of shit because you cannot differentiate the difference between the person making an argument and the argument the person is putting forward. It's your inability to stay on topic. Losing the debate, you turn to insults. I feel sorry for you.
I am American, native born. That bears into this discussion only as relevant because I am a native English speaker and your complete and utter failure in this debate partially comes from your lack of writing skills in English. You're pretty good, I admit, but I've read essays by well educated 13 year olds that are better. You cannot stay on topic. Irrelevant single sentence asides, followed by insults are not an argument. No wonder you're upset when I cut through it all to ask a question you won't answer because it will reveal your bullshit.
Who would have won WWI if the America hadn't joined?
You're an ethnic. Say it. American. You're not English. You're an ethnicity of English. So utterly diverse from English, you speak a different language, called a dialect.
What is a native born American? A Kalak. What is that, a wigwam? A canoe? A tepee? Suddenly you're speaking English? Because you read it on a corncob?
The corncob taught you Americans won WW1. It didn't teach you about any artillery. Or the railway lines. Why the trenches were built? America won. Blah blah, cornpone.
Your entire argument has been ignorant. You kept, and it's an American pastime, sticking your foot in your mouth. Until you sought to be even dumber on the actual comparison offered on how it all compares to WW1. Hahaha.
You started hostility. You started the insults. Read them. You replied to me.
The U.S. Census allows you to put "American" as an ethnic identity, which is what I did the last time I filled one out. Checkmate.
Your English is good, but you'd get a C- minus in my high school's English composition class, mostly because you can't stay on topic and your "flow" sucks worse than a broken vacuum. Sorry.
Disagreeing with you is not insulting you. Now you're delusional when you think I insulted you first. Did you get your coffee this morning?
See. Ethnic. You're delusional. Your class is already behind the English language. Somehow, remarkably you're grading it. This is when by your own standards you don't understand it. The pinnacles of delusional narcissism. Look what you did to the topic, corncob? You made it American.
Everyone has some ethnic identity based on their genetic lineage. I'm beginning to think that there isn't not something right in your head, and that you are literally insane.
And you can't, just can't, stay on topic can you? Poor English, bad writing.
I charitably refuse to insult you personally, just attack your arguments and lack of writing ability as it bears on your inane thesis. However, it's apparent that you're a sad sack of shit because you cannot differentiate the difference between the person making an argument and the argument the person is putting forward. It's your inability to stay on topic. Losing the debate, you turn to insults. I feel sorry for you.
I am American, native born. That bears into this discussion only as relevant because I am a native English speaker and your complete and utter failure in this debate partially comes from your lack of writing skills in English. You're pretty good, I admit, but I've read essays by well educated 13 year olds that are better. You cannot stay on topic. Irrelevant single sentence asides, followed by insults are not an argument. No wonder you're upset when I cut through it all to ask a question you won't answer because it will reveal your bullshit.
Who would have won WWI if the America hadn't joined?
You're an ethnic. Say it. American. You're not English. You're an ethnicity of English. So utterly diverse from English, you speak a different language, called a dialect.
What is a native born American? A Kalak. What is that, a wigwam? A canoe? A tepee? Suddenly you're speaking English? Because you read it on a corncob?
The corncob taught you Americans won WW1. It didn't teach you about any artillery. Or the railway lines. Why the trenches were built? America won. Blah blah, cornpone.
Your entire argument has been ignorant. You kept, and it's an American pastime, sticking your foot in your mouth. Until you sought to be even dumber on the actual comparison offered on how it all compares to WW1. Hahaha.
You started hostility. You started the insults. Read them. You replied to me.
The U.S. Census allows you to put "American" as an ethnic identity, which is what I did the last time I filled one out. Checkmate.
Your English is good, but you'd get a C- minus in my high school's English composition class, mostly because you can't stay on topic and your "flow" sucks worse than a broken vacuum. Sorry.
Disagreeing with you is not insulting you. Now you're delusional when you think I insulted you first. Did you get your coffee this morning?
Once again.....
Who would have won WWI if America hadn't joined?
See. Ethnic. You're delusional. Your class is already behind the English language. Somehow, remarkably you're grading it. This is when by your own standards you don't understand it. The pinnacles of delusional narcissism. Look what you did to the topic, corncob? You made it American.
Everyone has some ethnic identity based on their genetic lineage. I'm beginning to think that there isn't not something right in your head, and that you are literally insane.
And you can't, just can't, stay on topic can you? Poor English, bad writing.