a) who holds the trademark to "crimes against humanity"...the many or the few?

b) guilt vs innocence implies ones consent to suggested moralism, hence reasoning over it.

c) nature doesn't suggested definitions (limits), it designates (makes known) by setting itself apart, hence each one within wielding free will of choice to adapt to everything made known (perceivable inspiration).

In short...predefined (process of dying) generates re-definable (living).