a) agreement vs disagreement implies ones choice to want vs not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) ignoring perceivable need for suggested want represents suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion. Why? Cause ignoring need destroys self; while being tempted by want destroys ones surrounding.
c) everything "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is". If one consents to what "is", then one ignores what "was", while giving those who suggest what is the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict it at will.
mentally ill
Mind/memory cannot be ill, for it represents momentum (momentary) of motion (health) for everyone's choice within. Choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested represents the illness of ignoring ongoing momentum (inspiration) for captured moments (information).
Inspiration goes through ones mind/memory; information is being held by ones free will of choice within mind/memory. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto, it needs to resist the want to hold onto, while adapting to what goes through oneself.
Those who learn to let go, can draw gain from the flow of inspiration at any moment (um) of being moved, while those who hold onto information are drowning within loss, hence overburdening themselves. The few exploit this by keep suggesting information to fill the minds of the many, and like a vampire, each suggested piece of information requires ones consent to enter ones mind/memory.
Ignoring that ones mind (ment) is being moved puts one at dis-ease (plague)...choosing to resist (life) being moved (inception towards death) eases ones mind.
trans
a) motion (male) generates momentum (female), which establishes trans-formation (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
b) FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S (split) HE aka trans-formed SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...
Would either answer get you to consider the implications of the aforementioned questions?
Look around you...does normal human behavior seem to work out for humans? What if utilizing free will of choice would express behavior outside the "norm"? Would that confuse those who consented to follow suggested norms?
Remember Cheers..."where everybody knows your name"? What was the name that everyone within Cheers knows? NORM. That's a sleight of hand about what's going on in this world...fat jew makes a suggestion (what's up everybody); goyim consent to suggested (NORM; NORM; NORM...)
"Making your way (inception towards death) in the world today takes everything you've got (life)"..."Taking a break (ignorance) from all your worries (response-ability), sure would help a lot"..."Wouldn't you like to get away?"
Those who behave outside the norm have to be dehumanized (bots) as to keep those within the norm believing to be humans instead of domesticated cattle...
a) agreement vs disagreement implies ones choice to want vs not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) ignoring perceivable need for suggested want represents suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion. Why? Cause ignoring need destroys self; while being tempted by want destroys ones surrounding.
c) everything "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is". If one consents to what "is", then one ignores what "was", while giving those who suggest what is the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict it at will.
Mind/memory cannot be ill, for it represents momentum (momentary) of motion (health) for everyone's choice within. Choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested represents the illness of ignoring ongoing momentum (inspiration) for captured moments (information).
Inspiration goes through ones mind/memory; information is being held by ones free will of choice within mind/memory. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto, it needs to resist the want to hold onto, while adapting to what goes through oneself.
Those who learn to let go, can draw gain from the flow of inspiration at any moment (um) of being moved, while those who hold onto information are drowning within loss, hence overburdening themselves. The few exploit this by keep suggesting information to fill the minds of the many, and like a vampire, each suggested piece of information requires ones consent to enter ones mind/memory.
So only the mentally ill would ever defend themselves against a genocide?
a) GEN (generated) CIDE (murder)
b) what if generation (process of dying) generates re-generation (living)?
c) what if the generator gives to (inception) and takes from (death) each reactor (life) within?
d) if inception predefines death; then is life being murdered or given the opportunity to live?
e) could those alive being tricked to ignore perceivable generator for suggested genocide?
Ignoring that ones mind (ment) is being moved puts one at dis-ease (plague)...choosing to resist (life) being moved (inception towards death) eases ones mind.
a) motion (male) generates momentum (female), which establishes trans-formation (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
b) FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S (split) HE aka trans-formed SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...
So let’s take the same messaging and apply it to whites instead. If it’s working with trannies, it should work with any other specific group.
a) what "new" direction can there be for life being moved from inception towards death?
b) could suggested directions tempt one to ignore that perceiving partial (life) is being directed by perceivable whole (inception toward death)?
c) what is more VIOLENT (driven with force) than life being moved from inception towards death?
Bro are you a bot?
Would either answer get you to consider the implications of the aforementioned questions?
Look around you...does normal human behavior seem to work out for humans? What if utilizing free will of choice would express behavior outside the "norm"? Would that confuse those who consented to follow suggested norms?
Remember Cheers..."where everybody knows your name"? What was the name that everyone within Cheers knows? NORM. That's a sleight of hand about what's going on in this world...fat jew makes a suggestion (what's up everybody); goyim consent to suggested (NORM; NORM; NORM...)
"Making your way (inception towards death) in the world today takes everything you've got (life)"..."Taking a break (ignorance) from all your worries (response-ability), sure would help a lot"..."Wouldn't you like to get away?"
Those who behave outside the norm have to be dehumanized (bots) as to keep those within the norm believing to be humans instead of domesticated cattle...
So yes you’re a bot lol.
Oy vey!
They’re not mentally Ill they’re demonically possessed.
Unfortunately yes lol.