a) on itself; any suggested -ism (feminism) represents a temptation, but once consent is added, it becomes suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion...it's not a conflict: but the consequence of mutual choices within a contract (consent to suggested).
b) those who suggest the temptation (-ism) utilize consent given to justify exploiting the consequences.
c) those who consent (want or not want) to suggested temptation are stuck within a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among themselves.
d) reason cannot be won; because both sides are reasoning over a suggestion made by a 3rd party that isn't within the conflict, and that outside party holds the consent of everyone within as the means to define; redefine and contradict what the suggested means. Why? To instigate division; to control both sides of every conflict and to sustain the conflict by constantly changing the rules.
e) consenting to suggested (fiction) implies ignorance of perceivable (reality)...those who ignore reality ignore the sustenance of self, hence the lack of resistance and the escape into fiction for shelter.
f) those who consent to a male vs female conflict of reason are willingly ignoring that the sustenance of self requires intercourse between male/female for offspring.
The few inverted intercourse between male (upwards triangle) and female (downward triangle) for offspring (G aka generative)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2Aa2jvjS.jpg into a "versus" conflict between male and female.
It’s not warfare because no one does anything to them in response. It’s just genocide.
It’s illegal.
a) on itself; any suggested -ism (feminism) represents a temptation, but once consent is added, it becomes suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion...it's not a conflict: but the consequence of mutual choices within a contract (consent to suggested).
b) those who suggest the temptation (-ism) utilize consent given to justify exploiting the consequences.
c) those who consent (want or not want) to suggested temptation are stuck within a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among themselves.
d) reason cannot be won; because both sides are reasoning over a suggestion made by a 3rd party that isn't within the conflict, and that outside party holds the consent of everyone within as the means to define; redefine and contradict what the suggested means. Why? To instigate division; to control both sides of every conflict and to sustain the conflict by constantly changing the rules.
e) consenting to suggested (fiction) implies ignorance of perceivable (reality)...those who ignore reality ignore the sustenance of self, hence the lack of resistance and the escape into fiction for shelter.
f) those who consent to a male vs female conflict of reason are willingly ignoring that the sustenance of self requires intercourse between male/female for offspring.
The few inverted intercourse between male (upwards triangle) and female (downward triangle) for offspring (G aka generative)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2Aa2jvjS.jpg into a "versus" conflict between male and female.