If the tranny school shooting is a "false flag," it's not that it was fake (it wasn't, sorry folks), the shooter was put up to it so that people on the right will say "maybe there is something to red flag laws after all, these mentally ill trannies shouldn't have access to guns."
If red flag laws become acceptable to a large bulk of the normie-con right due to a surge of trannies shooting people who disagree with them, you're going to see them stick around or proliferate.
The Supreme Court already ruled on red flag laws in Caniglia v. Strom’s (9-0 decision in 2021) but it takes time for these things work through the system, again and again. Think of how many gun control laws got passed after Heller/McDonald which eventually resulted in Breun.
https://libertas.org/personal-freedom/supreme-court-ruling-delegitimizes-red-flag-laws/
Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.
The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions, primarily are suicidal.
Not seizing firearms, that landmark, after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.
Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with, if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.
My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.
Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.
The current gun laws are medical checks, specifically mental health. You cannot purchase guns without clearance. Except Trans have invalidated this. Trans can.
The same mental conditions aren't fit to be around children, teaching, in any other capacity, outside of giving birth, or supposedly parenting kids birthed. The same mental health conditions aren't fit for any kind of active duty.
Read that response. Their words. Obviously it is the biggest oxymoron. Why have they been given status? They are in fact a danger.
I have no idea what point you're actually trying to make here.
You must be really fucking impaired.
That was a ruling off a seizure. The guy went to a shrink. He already had guns, a gun collection. His Constitutional right. Suddenly a small hiccup. Some fucking shrink, his middle life crisis needed therapy. Reeerwarrr the poppers are seizing his guns, why? What was his health condition?
On the other hand current legislation is mental health isn't sold guns. The same conditions identified in that statement by the Trans community. They by law currently are not sold guns. In fact those same health and mental conditions cannot even by law work with children they're not fit for active duty.
So any ruling is on Trans status. "Rights". Gun, etc. Why are they being promoted as a sane and logical choice, when clearly if it was anybody else they'd be fucking disturbed and crazy.
Is English your native language? If it is, the public school system you went through did a really poor job with you. Your stream of consciousness set of mini-paragraphs unconnected by transitions rambled about and never made a point.
Now I'm wondering why I should bother with wading through what you're writing here. I don't mind reading, say, a Nietzsche page 2-3x to really absorb it, but I don't think you're really worth the time here. Sorry.