In a rejection letter, the university said: "The language is not sensitive and the misgendering of athletes is not appropriate... there is obvious bias in the language and there is very little scientific reasoning underpinning the hypothesis."
KCL took issue with how Dr Armstrong had referred to trans women as "males" in his research proposal.
Dr Armstrong's application had said: "The principle aim of the project is to find the views of athletes and volunteers on the question of when males should be allowed to compete in the female category in athletics."
http://opr.news/4edc860b230326en_us?link=1&client=opera
a) RE (respond) SEARCH (searching for) + RE (respond) JECT (throw away)
b) if another suggests one to search for, does one have the free will of choice to "throw away" the suggested?
c) was consent to suggested given before one can throw it away or could resisting the suggestion be seen as throwing away consent?
a) PROFITERI (lay claim to, declare openly) + STUDY (strive after)
b) if one professes claims and others resist striving after; then wouldn't one lose the power to hold onto the title "professor"?
c) if the natural order (inception towards death) openly declares itself by moving everything within, then what if life needs to strive to resist it?
a) WO (mb) MAN and FE (minine) MALE implies a transmutation of ingredient (female) out of base (male).
b) flow (male) generates momentum (female), which transmutes form (life) within flow (inception toward death).