I wanted to give a heads up about the moon psyop the deep state is running.
They are saying we never landed on the moon to promote their flat Earth psyop.
They did land on the moon but it wasn't Buzz Aldrin. It was other Deep State agents. Buzz Aldrin, Stanley Kurbric and others just made a Hollywood version of the Moon landing for the People's consumption. They don't want us to know that aliens exist on the dark side of the moon (the Greys). The craters you see on the moon was from ancient war they had. There are also computers in the moon that bounce a beam off Saturn onto our Planet which oppresses our consciousness and vibe frequency so we feel like we are living in a 3D hell hole. The good news is our natural evolution is on the brink of breaking through that illusion so the deep state has been trying to spread fear and misery to lower our vibe down. No worries though. They are on their last leg and will fall once we break through here soon.
I don't have a source of all this. I just read dozens of books and put the pieces of the puzzle together.
Thoughts (reasonings) are evidence all the time! In any case, it wasn’t just a thought, it was also a scientific law (the law of gravity) which is entirely demonstrable. Rocks cannot stay aloft perpetually in the sky, and it is an unscientific and ridiculous idea that is only thought acceptable now due to conditioning by rote under the guise of education, from childhood.
Lol, true - i tease. Our education informed that it perpetually falls without falling - even more stupid then what i said!
I’m all for that!
I require no alternative explanation to criticize/refute current ones. That’s silly!
Agreed!
It is preferable to indulging mythology and belief (fiction). The beginning of all knowledge is “i don’t know”. I used to believe it was a rock which floated in the sky and never fell - but have put such stupid and unscientific mythology behind me. Alas, that doesn’t automatically reveal the true nature of the moon, but it does open up other possibilities that are scientifically consistent.
I don’t know why you say “our.” This isn’t what I was taught either. But I digress, we’re talking about what it is, not what it isn’t.
Have you weighed the various possibilities in your mind?
Because “education” (conditioning by rote from childhood under its guise) is largely standardized. It is highly unlikely you were taught anything contradictory about the moon than i was - as interesting/fun as that would (and perhaps should!) be!
Of course it is! You just don’t like the phrasing because it makes plain how stupid it is.
If you truly weren’t taught that the moon is orbiting (i.e. perpetually falling towards/around) the earth, then i’d be interested in hearing what you were taught!
To a certain extent, yes. Though weighing possibilities / speculating is not a good way to study/establish reality. It is, however, somewhat useful to discard ideas that are patently inconsistent with reality - such as that the moon is a giant rock that floats in the sky and never falls.
It definitely does look like that I was taught something contradictory, because what you were taught does not appear to be what I was taught, based on how you're describing it.
The phrasing is what makes it not what I was taught. You can't just make up your own phrasing and claim it's the same lesson, because it isn't.
And I'd be interested in sharing that with you! However, over the course of many of our conversations I asked you a similar question, which is what the current reality is of the earth and moon and how they operate. You haven't shared that with me yet.
We both know that what i was taught is not consistent with reality, so there's no use discussing it further. The current goal is establishing what reality is
As i said, it is the phrasing you take issue with. It is highly unlikely you were taught anything else but the standard view of virtually all “education” available. The moon is a giant rock which perpetually falls towards/around the world in what we are taught as “orbit”.
You can rephrase things and have the rephrasing convey the same meaning. I recognize that the phrasing is logically offensive, but that doesn’t make it inconsistent with what you were taught.
I don’t think that is correct (either you asking this question, me not providing an answer - or both), but as i said - speculative alternatives are irrelevant. The moon is not and cannot be a rock which floats and never falls - it would be a violation of the law of gravity and many others. This does suggest other alternatives for what it may be, but it does not automatically fill the void of the current nonsense mythology identified and excised as such.
I was not aware you felt that way. What makes you conclude that what you were taught about the moon is not consistent with reality?
As for the latter, I agree - but rushing from one mythology to another out of desperation is a mistake (and a trap). There is no shame in, and in fact it is the first step of all knowledge, accepting and admitting that you do not know.