I wanted to give a heads up about the moon psyop the deep state is running.
They are saying we never landed on the moon to promote their flat Earth psyop.
They did land on the moon but it wasn't Buzz Aldrin. It was other Deep State agents. Buzz Aldrin, Stanley Kurbric and others just made a Hollywood version of the Moon landing for the People's consumption. They don't want us to know that aliens exist on the dark side of the moon (the Greys). The craters you see on the moon was from ancient war they had. There are also computers in the moon that bounce a beam off Saturn onto our Planet which oppresses our consciousness and vibe frequency so we feel like we are living in a 3D hell hole. The good news is our natural evolution is on the brink of breaking through that illusion so the deep state has been trying to spread fear and misery to lower our vibe down. No worries though. They are on their last leg and will fall once we break through here soon.
I don't have a source of all this. I just read dozens of books and put the pieces of the puzzle together.
It definitely does look like that I was taught something contradictory, because what you were taught does not appear to be what I was taught, based on how you're describing it.
The phrasing is what makes it not what I was taught. You can't just make up your own phrasing and claim it's the same lesson, because it isn't.
And I'd be interested in sharing that with you! However, over the course of many of our conversations I asked you a similar question, which is what the current reality is of the earth and moon and how they operate. You haven't shared that with me yet.
We both know that what i was taught is not consistent with reality, so there's no use discussing it further. The current goal is establishing what reality is
As i said, it is the phrasing you take issue with. It is highly unlikely you were taught anything else but the standard view of virtually all “education” available. The moon is a giant rock which perpetually falls towards/around the world in what we are taught as “orbit”.
You can rephrase things and have the rephrasing convey the same meaning. I recognize that the phrasing is logically offensive, but that doesn’t make it inconsistent with what you were taught.
I don’t think that is correct (either you asking this question, me not providing an answer - or both), but as i said - speculative alternatives are irrelevant. The moon is not and cannot be a rock which floats and never falls - it would be a violation of the law of gravity and many others. This does suggest other alternatives for what it may be, but it does not automatically fill the void of the current nonsense mythology identified and excised as such.
I was not aware you felt that way. What makes you conclude that what you were taught about the moon is not consistent with reality?
As for the latter, I agree - but rushing from one mythology to another out of desperation is a mistake (and a trap). There is no shame in, and in fact it is the first step of all knowledge, accepting and admitting that you do not know.
That's okay! I don't wish to speculate on alternatives. You have an understanding of how things operate in reality. If I haven't asked you directly before, I would like to take that opportunity now:
What is your current understanding of what the moon is, in reality?
Alas, that is all we have. As i said, when we recognize that the things we were taught as fact and science were actually mythology/speculation under its guise - all we are left with is a void. Filling that void once again with more speculation (explanation, in your parlance) is all well and good, but without validation it is just more mythology.
My speculative suspicion is that the moon is a plasma phenomenon “drawn” in the rarefied air far above us. It is consistent with the outliers/contradictory evidence i originally gave to you - though is far from proven/certain.
Speculating on alternatives is fun, but validation is what really matters!
What makes you believe that, and not, say, that it's a projection, or some other entity?