You have to read this to catch the loaded wording.
(www.vox.com)
Comments (3)
sorted by:
intentional confusion between the words sex and gender.
There are human rights and as such there is no distinction between or mention of sexual difference.
A choice isn't always a right. Right or wrong, there is no such thing as 'transgender rights'.
It took a while. But, I've become convinced the trans issue is misogany and a patriarchy issue. The more I learn, the more I realize the people saying it from the get go were correct.
"By sheer coincidence, another (hopefully less consequential) story involving the legal community’s approach to trans rights played out on the other side of the country the same day B.P.J. arrived at the Court."
"Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee to a federal appeals court and an unusually outspoken opponent of transgender rights, delivered a talk at Stanford Law School where he was repeatedly heckled by students. The story has played out more or less the same way a zillion other debates about campus protests have played out, with Duncan demanding an apology (and receiving one from Stanford), and his allies claiming that “free speech is dead” and calling for a Stanford official to be fired."
The kids that never got ass whoopings may have ruined it for the rest of them.
The case : "The plaintiff in B.P.J. was a sixth grade student when she filed this lawsuit. She hoped to join the girls’ cross country and track teams at her school, but because she is transgender, she was not allowed to under a West Virginia law, which provides that school athletes must play for the team that corresponds with their “biological sex.” She sued to challenge this law."
The law doesn't care about feelings, or identity politics.
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/3/14/23635663/supreme-court-transgender-sports-constitution-stanford-kyle-duncan-protest