Study Suggests AI Can Literally Read Your Mind, And With Extreme Accuracy.
Scientists from Osaka University, Japan have discovered a way to use artificial intelligence (AI) to read our minds – quite literally. By combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with AI technology, the researchers were able to recreate visual images dir...
If one cannot prevent input coming in, then does one still own it?
Who else besides you would? It's your consciousness.
Can others suggest you to put something in there? Can everything perceivable inspire you to put something in there? Without you putting something in there...would it be empty? What about you taking something out without residue?
Being conscious implies being aware of...so how could something that is yours be defined by what's coming in from outside?
Now you're just asking silly questions. Philosophy is the writing on the back of the cereal box.
a) what if there's an ongoing solution underneath all temporary questions and answers? How could one describe the solution to those who put questions and answers first?
b) if silliness represents "weakness of understanding", then what if I put out only questions I can already answer?
c) what if I utilize question and answer together? Would others then engage or feel left out of communication?
...a suggestion by others about what was perceivable beforehand, hence tempting one to ignore what was perceivable for what others suggest it is.
A justification to feel better about oneself while consenting to consume the suggested poison within the cereal box. Ever held the box, thinking how stupid the games, jokes and riddles are, while shoveling the cereal down your hatch? Imagine viewing this from the perspective of those suggesting the cereal...they see you physically consuming poison; while feeling mentally superior over the distractions on the box.
...and it'll be forced on the proles, the same way as the US legal system permits police to force 'biometric unlocking' of phones.
....implies ones consent to suggested phones beforehand.
What I've told people since they came out with [face | fingerprint] unlocking. "If it's offered, don't buy it, and if you already have it, don't use it".
The issue...it's easier to blame the phone; the ones suggesting it or you for suggesting to not buy/use it, then it is to question the weakness within self of consenting to suggested temptations by others.
That's three layers of justification for shirking responsibility...
Smartphones can't read your mind, unless you're "thinking out loud" by talking to yourself.
Reading implies sentences; words, letters...who put these into ones mind? Does the mind of a baby not work without such sentences; words and letters? How then can a mother "read" the mind of a baby?
It has already happened.
Mark my words.
Nah. According to this article, it takes MRI scans of the brain. I don't think that there is remote MRI imaging available...yet.
powerful enough radio towers or ungerground cables could be emitting Mri frequencies to map the local environment
Radio towers are designed to emit radio wave, not receive. You need some kind of device which can pick up super weak radio wave from human body, that’s more like a pinpoint directional radar. Such devices simply can't work on multiple people at once.
Could. But the question is, are they?
Most likely in large cities in the US. Could easily be concealed as a radio antenna or a ground level transformer. Also they could be placed in Skytrain stations or sports stadiums where people are stationary for large periods of time and alot of traffic. You need an emitter and receiver for MRI map correctly
You need a lot more than that. Possible, not probable.
The real question is not probable but profitable, there is alot of money in government contracts to map the populations though process. Or corporations working on AI? Or companies that want to selectively market
You're asking a lot of questions but giving me nothing.
What if suggested words mark those who consent to them, hence tempting one to willingly etch them into ones mind/memory when consenting?
Look at your surrounding...do you think about what you are perceiving or about what the suggested labels mean that you already consented to? Try looking at an "apple" from the perspective of a worm that doesn't perceive the label "apple"...what do you see?