Criminal Khazarians: Holding in Bakhmut is Beyond Retarded
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Personally I have always wanted to retain the acceptance he is working for good and not on the side of blatant evil.
I am aware of many ploys against him as a character and indeed have also been scanning for evidence of any obvious provable alignment with evil, none as of yet.
I do not recall reading this bit, I will give it a read.
At the end of the day, I have to state the chips are still in the air because I refuse to be misled.
So far all his rhetoric of late is evidence that he is on the side of repairing the evil, at least for his people, there is mountains of evidence to prove he has in his time in power done that already.
However, until he starts name dropping and actually doing the important steps, then I need to keep him at arms length.
What you hit on is the biggest argument against him. I take the view that brute force and main strength is seldom the wisest strategy to take, especially when your enemy is immensely powerful, deeply entrenched, and knows no boundary to their methodologies.
As I see it, Putin has been preparing for this time for more than 25 years. He's been building the economy and enhancing the Russian military-industrial complex, all on a shoestring budget. And all the while, he scrupulously avoided antagonizing his Western "partners" and "colleagues". A wise strategy, in my book.
This idea was cemented for me when I came across some information about the sinking of the Kursk back in 2000, "anomalous" evidence as I have described.
Long story short, Putin deliberately let 23 survivors perish. Evil? Call it what you will, but the Kursk was sunk in an engagement with one US and one UK sub. Had the survivors told the tale, the Russian people would have demanded a fight. Putin knew they were unprepared for such a fight, and who knows how many would die. He made a tremendously difficult decision.
You can see that the picture I have built up is quite complex, and includes data seldom discussed, but at least it's consistent.
There is no question that the biding of time has been the status qua for basically all of his time in related roles.
This is naturally the only correct action to take in a world of such criminal groups, you cannot come out guns blazing to be sure. You would have the unending reaction of a human force that would be larger than anything in history given the scale of modern times.
The current control systems have gathered nearly a global scope, certainly all the western countries are fed from the same trough.
I think this is low balling it as I have eluded to. I am convinced the systems in place have reigned all power for a considerable amount of time already.
Daily we can see the rising tide of western leadership flock to the statements provided, beating the war drum as if they have a comparable might ready to deploy.
When in reality, there is nothing to field, literally sadness comparatively.