I haven't been following Edward Dowd much-- has he gotten a bunch of stuff wrong that he reports on? That's the metric I'd use to measure veracity. Lots of legitimate reasons a source wouldn't want to be made public.
It's a major bummer that it's like that these days. Opens the floodgates for bullshit artists and grifters like never before.
Name the source, cowards. Absolute dingdong bullshit.
Bob
BOB IS FULL OF SHIT
Burning a source is a good way to ensure you don't get more intel. If the source is good, they should be protected.
Not verifiable. Not trustworthy.
I haven't been following Edward Dowd much-- has he gotten a bunch of stuff wrong that he reports on? That's the metric I'd use to measure veracity. Lots of legitimate reasons a source wouldn't want to be made public.
It's a major bummer that it's like that these days. Opens the floodgates for bullshit artists and grifters like never before.