a) CONTRA (against) DICERE (to speak) -TION (through action)...speaking represents different reactions within the same enacting sound. Every word represents inclusive within sound, while every choice to speak represents exclusive to one another.
b) MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...life being moved from inception towards death implies being within constant change aka exclusive partial (living) within inclusive whole (process of dying).
three...religions at the same time?
Every RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. If each one of the many chooses to consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
Sure they are. Christianity says that Christ is God and the son of God, Islam claims he's only a prophet, and judaism counts him as a liar and false Messiah. There is no way to reconcile those positions, only one can be correct.
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...that bond implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence binding oneself to the will of others by willing consent...the claim "my" tempts one to ignore that.
created is separate and distinct
Separated distinction aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything)...not suggested creationism (out of nothing).
One (partial) can only be within all (whole) and all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power".
How are you three mutually exclusive religions at the same time? All three have core beliefs that contradict each other.
a) CONTRA (against) DICERE (to speak) -TION (through action)...speaking represents different reactions within the same enacting sound. Every word represents inclusive within sound, while every choice to speak represents exclusive to one another.
b) MU'TUAL, adjective [Latin mutuus, from muto, to change.]...life being moved from inception towards death implies being within constant change aka exclusive partial (living) within inclusive whole (process of dying).
Every RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. If each one of the many chooses to consent to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
Sure they are. Christianity says that Christ is God and the son of God, Islam claims he's only a prophet, and judaism counts him as a liar and false Messiah. There is no way to reconcile those positions, only one can be correct.
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...that bond implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, hence binding oneself to the will of others by willing consent...the claim "my" tempts one to ignore that.
Separated distinction aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything)...not suggested creationism (out of nothing).
One (partial) can only be within all (whole) and all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power".