Elon Speaks Against The New World Order
(rumble.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Umm no. Arabs caused the fall of Rome 846. Another pillar crumbling from previous sacking. Arabs prior Cathargians, as rebellious from the Punic wars, as they were to Cleopatra. Barbarians swept the East, Huns. Moors, and Arabs spilled into Southern Europe Spain, Portugal. Vikings as well. Islam formed later. By then the Holy Roman Empire was established and moved into Consantinople. Fighting the crusades. Then the Barbarians now Mongols sacked parts of Islam like Baghdad etc. Then Islam sacked Constantinople. Islamic renaissance happen during the Ottomans. After the Mongols fell. Islamic founding is seeped in civil war. Like Christian founding is obscured in the fall of Rome.
Civilizations advancing at this point were in the Americas, and South East Asia. Some of their cities, dwarfing modern cities. Multi-millions. Like China, Angkor Wat, Mayan.
umm ok.
Islam wasn't really advancing as Rome was falling. An oxymoron. Islamic Renaissance happened after the fall of Constaninople? As the Ottomans Empire emerged. It also invaded Rome.
Otherwise it was subjected to crusades and barbarians
Arabs, prior Carthagians were another pillar of Roman demise invading in 846. Moors spread across the common trade route, it is as old as Atlantis, into Southern Spain. Same as they did in the Punic Wars. While barbarians threatened its outer influence. Vikings, Huns. Until it re-established itself in Constantinople. Immediately fighting Islam, Crusades. Didn't a Holy Roman Emperor prior, also invade destroying Alexandria again, like Caesar, the library. Mongols sacked Bhagdad one of the most brutal slaughters in history millions killed.
About these horselords old Hungarian script has understood Aborigines? The phonetics are otherwise global. It even was able to communicate in Swahili. Modern Hungarian is the Latin.
Of course this is subject to debate. But hell. There is a lot that doesn't fit the concentric narratives.
Although he is wrong in concluding Islam was emerging then. It fought Rome for status and then dominated through the Ottomans for centuries. As Europeans fought each other much like Arabs also did but who is counting.
ok
Yea that doesn't say much. Tell me I'm wrong get out some dates and Google a nice modern narrative of published history ignoring all the anomalies.
He is right all our eggs in one basket sooner stinks. Conflict innovates. Competition. It survives. It takes competing ideas to progress. Otherwise in a fall of Babel, it's back to the barbarians.
ok
Fuck off, blocked.
80% of the audience are Arabs.
ok