Who are the idiots that reduced the system until this occurred?
Karl Marx. Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Remove individual incentive for achievement and you get communist bureaucracy which becomes an inefficient behemoth organization that attracts the most corrupt people or else the most pseudo-intellectually-fraudulent people.
Why was it lit on fire?
From what I've read, the chemical is burned which causes a chemical reaction. The byproduct of the burning is less harmful gasses. Still bad, but less bad than letting it seep into the ground.
Just because we disagree on the importance of this story doesn't mean we are enemies.
Getting poison into prime land is a bad thing, people should be upset and aware and involved in the solutions for this type of mess. You are here attempting to proclaim all is fine shit happens carry on, nothing needs to be done. You are wrong again.
Fair enough but I sniff a bit of climate alarmism in that paragraph. No one wants a train car full of chemicals burning in their neighborhood. It sucks for those people who live there. No doubt. But it ranks a little bit lower than billions of poisonous jew jabs being injected into gentile children who are at no fucking risk of dying from covid which the jew jab claims to protect them from. Until Fauci and Gates and Bourla and these lying Jew Jab pushers are mass impaled, I can't deal with train wrecks right now.
That said, I appreciate you updating us and linking to any new evidence you find. Ultimately, I remain open minded and admit I do not have all the facts here and maybe you know something I don't know.
While I won't pretend to be an environmental chemist, my basic understanding is that remediating the ground in the location would have been less poison spread as well as less overall impact on the region.
From what I understand burning it produces yet more poisonous chemicals that once spread around as such collecting them would be non trivial, so simply shooting for dilution.
This is not a good approach and I stand fast to suggesting keeping it on site and remediating it from there would have been the easiest and safest choice. Resulting in overall far less poison in the environment. Burning it was a mistake.
But it ranks a little bit lower than billions of poisonous jew jabs
Karl Marx. Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Remove individual incentive for achievement and you get communist bureaucracy which becomes an inefficient behemoth organization that attracts the most corrupt people or else the most pseudo-intellectually-fraudulent people.
From what I've read, the chemical is burned which causes a chemical reaction. The byproduct of the burning is less harmful gasses. Still bad, but less bad than letting it seep into the ground.
Just because we disagree on the importance of this story doesn't mean we are enemies.
Fair enough but I sniff a bit of climate alarmism in that paragraph. No one wants a train car full of chemicals burning in their neighborhood. It sucks for those people who live there. No doubt. But it ranks a little bit lower than billions of poisonous jew jabs being injected into gentile children who are at no fucking risk of dying from covid which the jew jab claims to protect them from. Until Fauci and Gates and Bourla and these lying Jew Jab pushers are mass impaled, I can't deal with train wrecks right now.
That said, I appreciate you updating us and linking to any new evidence you find. Ultimately, I remain open minded and admit I do not have all the facts here and maybe you know something I don't know.
While I won't pretend to be an environmental chemist, my basic understanding is that remediating the ground in the location would have been less poison spread as well as less overall impact on the region.
From what I understand burning it produces yet more poisonous chemicals that once spread around as such collecting them would be non trivial, so simply shooting for dilution.
This is not a good approach and I stand fast to suggesting keeping it on site and remediating it from there would have been the easiest and safest choice. Resulting in overall far less poison in the environment. Burning it was a mistake.
And of course I 100% agree with you here.