Exactly. I've been wondering, "what is the angle here?", because I feel the same exact thing, that they are creating the narrative that nobody is talking about this, when literally everybody is talking about this. Maybe it's just us creating that narrative. Anyway, I get the feeling that more stupid rules are coming. Fucking scumbag pieces of shit removed the safety rules that actually mattered (I was reading the other day about how the Obama administration reversed some kind of rules about the chemical load size requirements, etc., I don't recall correctly, but basically the exact kind of thing that you would have in place to prevent something like this from being as big of a problem as it was), and then they will use the aftermath of this, the exact same group of people who turned off those rules, to convince us that we need draconian rules that will somehow fuck us all over and increase the prices of things we buy by 250%. Actually, in reality, this will just be used as further justification for taxing carbon emissions or some bullshit.
I somewhat agree, after seeing the footage of the sparks in the axle, but I have to also acknowledge the fact that there was a movie that predicted this happening, in Ohio. I don't know what to think anymore. I was just talking to my brother today about how I wondered whether there really were this many new things happening or whether this was just a case of the media hyping everything up, and that these kinds of things were already happening at a similar frequency.
Your very last point actually automatically disqualified as anybody who took that poison from complaining LMFAO. "how could they poison us like this!!??" [walks into clinic to mainline toxins into his veins]
I am convinced that if any of the popular conspiracies ever get accepted by the rest of the world, the same people who have peddling them for years will flip and claim that they are not true anymore.
It doesn't matter if one wants suggested or not want it, each choice puts one against the other. Those reasoning don't realize their choices (want or not want), because they're busy reasoning against each other about whatever "thing" suggested.
Meanwhile; the suggesting few keep rebranding want vs not want into true vs false; right vs wrong; yes vs no; good vs bad; us vs them; left vs right; nationalism vs internationalism; rich vs poor; soccer vs football; deist vs atheist; hetero vs homo; anime vs manga; upvote vs downvote; week vs weekend; jew vs gentile; social vs asocial; black vs white; pro-life vs pro-choice; gasoline vs diesel; first world vs third world; vanilla vs chocolate; on vs off; past vs future; min vs max; small vs large; cops vs robbers...endless dualism.
a) anything suggested contradicts everything perceivable, because shaping a suggestion tempts one to ignore the perceivable origin; within which one shapes suggestions.
b) perceivable (inception towards death) generates perceiving (life) through "forward" motion...no conflict. Ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) tempts one into a want vs not want conflict of reason.
In short...perceivable FOR perceiving, or perceiving CONTRA perceiving over suggested.
Russians are under pressure to retaliate to Nordstream after Hersh’s reporting.
Biden was anticipating a potential attack on infrastructure in response.
Ohio happens and social media narrative is very sticky (Ohio has been Chernobyl’d!).
Biden is probably quite paranoid that it was sabotage and issued a gag order, to limit any damage from a PR perspective (if it was sabotage, the public fallout would be part of the attack).
Media only picks up story once it gets steam on social media.
May have been sabotage, or maybe not. Likely just an accident.
Exactly. I've been wondering, "what is the angle here?", because I feel the same exact thing, that they are creating the narrative that nobody is talking about this, when literally everybody is talking about this. Maybe it's just us creating that narrative. Anyway, I get the feeling that more stupid rules are coming. Fucking scumbag pieces of shit removed the safety rules that actually mattered (I was reading the other day about how the Obama administration reversed some kind of rules about the chemical load size requirements, etc., I don't recall correctly, but basically the exact kind of thing that you would have in place to prevent something like this from being as big of a problem as it was), and then they will use the aftermath of this, the exact same group of people who turned off those rules, to convince us that we need draconian rules that will somehow fuck us all over and increase the prices of things we buy by 250%. Actually, in reality, this will just be used as further justification for taxing carbon emissions or some bullshit.
I somewhat agree, after seeing the footage of the sparks in the axle, but I have to also acknowledge the fact that there was a movie that predicted this happening, in Ohio. I don't know what to think anymore. I was just talking to my brother today about how I wondered whether there really were this many new things happening or whether this was just a case of the media hyping everything up, and that these kinds of things were already happening at a similar frequency.
Your very last point actually automatically disqualified as anybody who took that poison from complaining LMFAO. "how could they poison us like this!!??" [walks into clinic to mainline toxins into his veins]
I am convinced that if any of the popular conspiracies ever get accepted by the rest of the world, the same people who have peddling them for years will flip and claim that they are not true anymore.
Reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested)
It doesn't matter if one wants suggested or not want it, each choice puts one against the other. Those reasoning don't realize their choices (want or not want), because they're busy reasoning against each other about whatever "thing" suggested.
Meanwhile; the suggesting few keep rebranding want vs not want into true vs false; right vs wrong; yes vs no; good vs bad; us vs them; left vs right; nationalism vs internationalism; rich vs poor; soccer vs football; deist vs atheist; hetero vs homo; anime vs manga; upvote vs downvote; week vs weekend; jew vs gentile; social vs asocial; black vs white; pro-life vs pro-choice; gasoline vs diesel; first world vs third world; vanilla vs chocolate; on vs off; past vs future; min vs max; small vs large; cops vs robbers...endless dualism.
https://files.catbox.moe/85t2x4.jpeg
Contrarian.
a) anything suggested contradicts everything perceivable, because shaping a suggestion tempts one to ignore the perceivable origin; within which one shapes suggestions.
b) perceivable (inception towards death) generates perceiving (life) through "forward" motion...no conflict. Ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) tempts one into a want vs not want conflict of reason.
In short...perceivable FOR perceiving, or perceiving CONTRA perceiving over suggested.
It’s not that hard to figure out what happened.
Russians are under pressure to retaliate to Nordstream after Hersh’s reporting.
Biden was anticipating a potential attack on infrastructure in response.
Ohio happens and social media narrative is very sticky (Ohio has been Chernobyl’d!).
Biden is probably quite paranoid that it was sabotage and issued a gag order, to limit any damage from a PR perspective (if it was sabotage, the public fallout would be part of the attack).
Media only picks up story once it gets steam on social media.
May have been sabotage, or maybe not. Likely just an accident.
It's not an attack, just 7 COINCIDENCES