It doesn't matter if one wants suggested or not want it, each choice puts one against the other. Those reasoning don't realize their choices (want or not want), because they're busy reasoning against each other about whatever "thing" suggested.
Meanwhile; the suggesting few keep rebranding want vs not want into true vs false; right vs wrong; yes vs no; good vs bad; us vs them; left vs right; nationalism vs internationalism; rich vs poor; soccer vs football; deist vs atheist; hetero vs homo; anime vs manga; upvote vs downvote; week vs weekend; jew vs gentile; social vs asocial; black vs white; pro-life vs pro-choice; gasoline vs diesel; first world vs third world; vanilla vs chocolate; on vs off; past vs future; min vs max; small vs large; cops vs robbers...endless dualism.
a) anything suggested contradicts everything perceivable, because shaping a suggestion tempts one to ignore the perceivable origin; within which one shapes suggestions.
b) perceivable (inception towards death) generates perceiving (life) through "forward" motion...no conflict. Ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) tempts one into a want vs not want conflict of reason.
In short...perceivable FOR perceiving, or perceiving CONTRA perceiving over suggested.
Reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested)
It doesn't matter if one wants suggested or not want it, each choice puts one against the other. Those reasoning don't realize their choices (want or not want), because they're busy reasoning against each other about whatever "thing" suggested.
Meanwhile; the suggesting few keep rebranding want vs not want into true vs false; right vs wrong; yes vs no; good vs bad; us vs them; left vs right; nationalism vs internationalism; rich vs poor; soccer vs football; deist vs atheist; hetero vs homo; anime vs manga; upvote vs downvote; week vs weekend; jew vs gentile; social vs asocial; black vs white; pro-life vs pro-choice; gasoline vs diesel; first world vs third world; vanilla vs chocolate; on vs off; past vs future; min vs max; small vs large; cops vs robbers...endless dualism.
https://files.catbox.moe/85t2x4.jpeg
Contrarian.
a) anything suggested contradicts everything perceivable, because shaping a suggestion tempts one to ignore the perceivable origin; within which one shapes suggestions.
b) perceivable (inception towards death) generates perceiving (life) through "forward" motion...no conflict. Ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) tempts one into a want vs not want conflict of reason.
In short...perceivable FOR perceiving, or perceiving CONTRA perceiving over suggested.