Yawn yawn. Mirror strawman. Look in the mirror there's the scarecrow. With the chemicals. They need to glide right, glide, land on a course, hit a target. Or they're doing what. Blowing the WMDS everywhere. So your balloon needs. Thrust.
Balloon can carry how much weight? Science. Like math equation. Tell me. You could put an elephant into upper orbit. There is this cartoon. At least there is of the child and the clown floating. Balloons simply need?
These balloons aren't those other countermeasures, you know they release a bunch of balloons to decoy the SAMs into firing at the balloons now they launch the missiles destroying the SAM. Those balloons blow everywhere. They are very cheap.
A spy balloon on recon, needs what? It needs to take pictures and readings. So it needs a course. It doesn't want to get found either. Or what happens? Therefore it needs, like your first strike biological weapon, tell me this word? Thrust.
No, I don't care what it was, if it was spying. It was spying. Entering another's nation's airspace without permission. Spying. Makes no difference. It's hostile.
But you needed too look at its camera and instruments and vehicle to tell me this? Good for you. I didn't care. It's hostile. Pop it.
They are being used as a countermeasure right now. Ukraine. And they were used in recent conflicts, Iraq and possibly Syria. Look it up. They attach reflectors on them for want of better word like jammer similar thing. Now you launch your strike, because the SAM is targeting balloons, and the clown attached to them.
Exactly, long established feature that you're now claiming. Previously you said any glide was a diriguble, or a blimp. How you couldn't put an elephant into upper orbit. Because you wanted to blow the payload everywhere.
Tedious, at least we've done the steps and you're getting somewhere. Don't worry. He can change. Thank God.
The use of specific balloons in the US is the topic. Not Ukraine or other wars. The overwhelming assumption is that China doesn't want to get into a kinetic, hot war. At least not here. Taiwan maybe, but not now.
Enough thrust to have some control over your route is far different from unlimited LIFT, or enough for any payload you want which is what you started with. Using a balloon in the first place suggests light weight, and that seems to be the case.
None of this should be surprising to you, you're failing the Turing test.
The USA using the countermeasure balloons in Iraq and quite possibly Syria. You brought it up. How those balloons don't work. Instead you'd use them like a terrorist with the chemical weapons. Because they're not a first strike vehicle. Despite of painting any targets for. First Strike. The article read can potentially be equipped with hypersonics.
But then you went out of your way to call the article fiction and have this absurd conversation. It's now back to the denial, we were getting somewhere, don't worry it happens after clarity. Then it's sorrow. But I don't think you'll get there.
What did you write. It's not only the autism, it's the memory loss. You wrote it's not a balloon if it has the thrust. It is called something else if a balloon navigates a course, and despite of the Montgolfier brothers, attaching an elephant.
Yawn yawn. Mirror strawman. Look in the mirror there's the scarecrow. With the chemicals. They need to glide right, glide, land on a course, hit a target. Or they're doing what. Blowing the WMDS everywhere. So your balloon needs. Thrust.
Balloon can carry how much weight? Science. Like math equation. Tell me. You could put an elephant into upper orbit. There is this cartoon. At least there is of the child and the clown floating. Balloons simply need?
These balloons aren't those other countermeasures, you know they release a bunch of balloons to decoy the SAMs into firing at the balloons now they launch the missiles destroying the SAM. Those balloons blow everywhere. They are very cheap.
A spy balloon on recon, needs what? It needs to take pictures and readings. So it needs a course. It doesn't want to get found either. Or what happens? Therefore it needs, like your first strike biological weapon, tell me this word? Thrust.
No, I don't care what it was, if it was spying. It was spying. Entering another's nation's airspace without permission. Spying. Makes no difference. It's hostile.
But you needed too look at its camera and instruments and vehicle to tell me this? Good for you. I didn't care. It's hostile. Pop it.
Scarecrow.
Thrust is a long established feature on a balloon. We don't know if these had it, according to the official narrative that they destroyed everything.
Nothing was launched at whatever we destroyed it with.
I wouldn't think a balloon would be a useful countermeasure, no; you seem to be throwing buzzwords around without purpose. From the beginning.
They are being used as a countermeasure right now. Ukraine. And they were used in recent conflicts, Iraq and possibly Syria. Look it up. They attach reflectors on them for want of better word like jammer similar thing. Now you launch your strike, because the SAM is targeting balloons, and the clown attached to them.
Exactly, long established feature that you're now claiming. Previously you said any glide was a diriguble, or a blimp. How you couldn't put an elephant into upper orbit. Because you wanted to blow the payload everywhere.
Tedious, at least we've done the steps and you're getting somewhere. Don't worry. He can change. Thank God.
The use of specific balloons in the US is the topic. Not Ukraine or other wars. The overwhelming assumption is that China doesn't want to get into a kinetic, hot war. At least not here. Taiwan maybe, but not now.
Enough thrust to have some control over your route is far different from unlimited LIFT, or enough for any payload you want which is what you started with. Using a balloon in the first place suggests light weight, and that seems to be the case.
None of this should be surprising to you, you're failing the Turing test.
The USA using the countermeasure balloons in Iraq and quite possibly Syria. You brought it up. How those balloons don't work. Instead you'd use them like a terrorist with the chemical weapons. Because they're not a first strike vehicle. Despite of painting any targets for. First Strike. The article read can potentially be equipped with hypersonics.
But then you went out of your way to call the article fiction and have this absurd conversation. It's now back to the denial, we were getting somewhere, don't worry it happens after clarity. Then it's sorrow. But I don't think you'll get there.
What did you write. It's not only the autism, it's the memory loss. You wrote it's not a balloon if it has the thrust. It is called something else if a balloon navigates a course, and despite of the Montgolfier brothers, attaching an elephant.
Tedious, tediously. Go to rehab.