NaturePhobia So afraid of natural processes, one must artificially create
BinaryPhobia Inability to process the concept of two choices
While we are on the topic of language, lets call those NaturePhobic and BinaryPhobic for what they are. Fearful of nature and the concept of a choice between two options.
Granted there is no choice when it comes to gender. Im happy with these two labels.
Whats gonna be? Who is really the fearful person here? Is it the person who questiona nature and is unable to process the most basic of decisions ? ( in this case the 'brilliant' idea of going head on against nature )
If you ask me, the person who accepts nature for what it is has the ability to focus on actual real problems that dont involve the imagination placing a false identity over one self.
Youre afraid of nature if youre trying to change what you were born as.
Youre afraid of decisions if you think you have the ability to choose your own gender.
Oh well.
Let the war continue.
All words are made up.
Fight me.
All words are powerful. In class you learn to spell... Witches also can cast a spell. An S can make a word a sword. Swords can cut, so can words. Spelling is just manifesting, making up.
Words are made up.
Fin
The few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) or what you call "making up", as to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka shaping within, out of and in response to perceivable base as the perceiving ingredient.
Transmutation of form (life) out of flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...temporary ingredient out of ongoing base alchemy.
Mimic the ongoing sound by humming, then make up words while continue to hum. Notice that others can be tempted to ignore the ongoing (perceivable) for the temporary (suggested) if consented to, which gives you the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning as an overlay upon the predefined, perceivable sound.
The only "weapon of choice" represents ones free will of choice to weaponize everything else...or resist the temptation of doing that.
WITCH (phonetic which) one casts the spell (suggestion) and WITCH one consents to it?
What if perceivable balance towards perceiving choice natural law, can be inverted by choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law? What if the few utilize contract law on a mass scale to bind the consenting many anew to the suggestions of the few through RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"?
This user has no posts.
No suggestions (no posts); no judgements (no up/down-votes)...instead adaptation to perceivable for balance.
Only nature offers...everything within reacts...either in response (need) or in ignorance (want) when consenting to one another.
Shaped out of perceivable sound and suggested towards consent as words to one another...it's called spell-craft. Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics,sound), while those who consent to suggested words as definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
The few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore perceivable IN SANUS (within sound) and PER SONOS (by sound), which imply being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound, as the reacting resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
What will one choose...need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information)?
Consenting to want or not want suggested information tempts one into the conflict of reason aka want versus not want. There's no fight between perceivable whole and each perceiving partial...only if the partial ignores the whole for the suggestions of other partials can there be a fight.
As resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) one represents the temporary growth of resistance within the ongoing loss of velocity, while being tempted by others to spend resistance against one another instead of for the sustenance of self.
If each one of the many willingly ignores to resist, then the few can exploit them while facing less and less resistance...until velocity generates the next batch of resistance.
This is awesome. Great discovery. How about this one: Objectaphobic-fear of objective moral values.
One can only pretend to create (out of nothing) by a) ignoring to be within the natural process when "creating out of nothing" and b) others have to consent to believe the suggested creation, while also ignoring the perceivable natural process.
It's ones choice within perceivable balance (need/want)...both need to resist and want to be tempted by are based on the same momentum of motion for each different choice within.
a) nature communicates sound, those within represent the choice to adapt (resonance) or ignore (dissonance) the same origin of sound.
b) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] represents ones choice of want over need, hence the wish/desire to ignore need for want.
a) choice represents the reaction within enacting balance, therefore balance GENerates choice aka action generating reaction.
b) GEN'DER, noun (Latin genus, geno, gigno; Gr.to beget, or to be born) + NATURE, noun (Latin born, produced), hence generator (process of dying) producing/giving birth to reactors (living).
To be implies within; out of and in response to, hence the internal/inherent power within EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the WHAT, pronoun - "relative (whole) and substitute (partial)".
Whoever one consents to suggested outcome over perceivable origin, because fear implies of outcome, while overcoming the temptation of fear implies resisting origin, hence growing ones resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying).
In short...death tempts fear, resisting being moved towards death grows resistance, hence life.
The nature of a PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies the "origin" of sound, while every suggested question tempts one seek "outcomes" in suggested answers.
Nature represents the ongoing solution (process of dying) for each temporary problem (living) within, hence ones struggle to sustain self (life) while being dissolved (inception towards death) by.
Balance (momentum of motion) represents the base, each choice within represents the "transmuted" ingredient at the center of balance.
"free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom aka temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
Inception towards death implies "velocity" aka forward motion, while life implies "resistance" within velocity, hence struggling to resist being moved (temptation) towards death (predefined outcome) since inception (origin).
The issue...consenting to want or not want suggested tempts one into a want VERSUS not want conflict (reasoning), while ignoring to be choice at the center of perceivable balance (need/want)...no conflict in-between need/want...only choice.
Resistance (living) isn't against nature (process of dying)...it represents the center of nature, the partial within the whole; the potential within potentiality; the reaction within action; the temporary within ongoing etc.
Being the reacting problem (living) within the actual (enacting) solution (process of dying), hence ones perceiving viewpoint reflecting (focus) all perceivalbe.
Ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore that.
"one" implies being different from other ones. Others suggest IDEN'TITY, noun "sameness" to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences.
Sameness (whole process of dying) generates differences (partial living); hence ones struggle to sustain temporary apartheid (living) within ongoing wholeness (process of dying).
Each one (life) was born into and by constant change (inception towards death), hence the constant need of the temporary partial to adapt to the ongoing whole.