Idolatry
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
idolatry. extreme admiration, love, or reverence for something or someone.
Idols are not just objects. Loving Jesus is considered idolatry by the Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropomorphism
I love the world cup. It's okay to enjoy things. Just don't let it consume your life.
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Aka I want what another suggests, which implies I consent to a conflict of reason between all those who want vs not want what others are suggesting. This conflict gives those suggesting the power to define (international world cup); redefine (nation vs nation) and contradict (black vs black) what others are reasoning over, while controlling both sides of the conflict.
This way the many can be tempted by a few to become willing spectators of controlled conflicts of reason, while ignoring that the few use their ignorance to attack on international level, from within nations and to the point of replacing the spectators who are still looking at the distraction because they "enjoy things"...
Living implies within the process of dying, hence ones partial struggle to resist being consumed by the whole.
That Hel figurine is dope as fuck. Ypu are basing your "Idolitry" bullshit off the bible....yet you have Christ in this....You shilling????????? Fuckin Kurt Shillin-ger that you????
Jesus isn't a figurine
Someone's mad that he never got a trophy
Someone really likes trophies
What's wrong with trophies?
You Vil Vvorship Ze Statue
What's wrong with trophies?
Is rhat such a difficult question to answer?
You Vil Vvorship Ze Statue
Did I break you?
If your wife was one you'd know what was wrong with them.
If you had one for a wife (a trophy wife), you'd know what was wrong with them.
A joke
What's wrong with trophies: I got rid of all of mine but two for keepsake memories of my dad. I don't need them. I put away a lot of things I used to think were a big deal when I was young. Is that wrong?
a) choosing want over need implies holding onto while ignoring to resist temptation by letting go.
b) the few suggest progressivism in combination with affirmation to both keep the many going (hence spending resistance towards outcomes) or tempt them to shirk responsibility of resisting (hence holding onto affirmation gained).
c) those who ignore balance can be tempted to ignore the consequences of their growth (the loss of others) by distracting and directing them with idols achieved or yet to gain.
d) consenting to suggested implies RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by), hence giving those suggesting the power to set "representatives" before the consenting ones, while keep suggesting in the name of (in nomine) those representatives.
Those who suggest don't even require puppets to speak for them...anything representing the initial suggestion is enough to motivate those who already consent to push forward until they spend all their resistance against whatever they are being directed at or until another representative tempts them to change course.