Ever wonder why Jan 6er grandmas are still in solitary confinement for a glorified tour of the capital while antifa burned cities for months up to the election and called themselves "mostly peaceful"? Why do they pretend to know the best course of humanity towards "progress"? Why is fucking children "progressive"? Why they say being "assigned a gender at birth" is oppression?
Because marxism is a religious cult based on proto-christian gnostic doctrine. The idea that the soul is trapped in this universe by an evil God to toil is the same as being trapped in the wrong body by an evil doctor. Everything needs to be "oppression" for them to emulate their deity which is Satan cast out of heaven.
They literally believe they are gods. This is why they "know" better than you. This is where their arrogance comes from. This is an ancient religion repackaged to worship the state in place of God. This is why they are so attached to "new age" occultism, it's just old occultism with a new coat of paint. The old religious practices will be re-established under the cover of "woke".
Why do they pretend to know the best course of humanity towards "progress"?
a) because the few suggest progressivism, while the many consent to follow, which allows the few to misdirect the many.
b) if knowledge implies "perceivable", then those who don't ignore it for "suggested" know the only course for life...from inception towards death, hence being resistance within progression.
Why is fucking children "progressive"?
Progression (inception towards death) destroys children (life)...fucking (lust) feeds progression. Therefore...progression equals temptation and needs to be resisted.
Why they say being "assigned a gender at birth" is oppression?
Because GENeration (process of dying) implies division into regeneration (living), hence SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female".
Ignoring generated division (perceivable differences) for suggested sameness (any ideology, in this case gender) tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self by "expression" (growth within loss through resistance). Those who ignore to express are repressing themselves, which implies that what they consent to believe (gender-ideology) represents oppressive thoughts aka the burden of impositions.
...ism is a religious cult
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents contract law, "-ism" represents the sales-pitch to gain consent to suggested, hence binding consenting choice to suggesting choice, which then allows those suggesting to cultivate the behavior of those consenting.
gnostic doctrine
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] implies teaching (doctrine) oneself by adapting to perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
Ignoring this by consenting to suggested Gnosticism (or any other -ism) allows others to indoctrinate one with suggested information.
Everything needs to be "oppression"
Everything perceivable is "impressing" upon each one perceiving it from within, which when consented to allows to express growth (living) within impressing loss (process of dying).
Ignoring perceivable for suggested, accumulates all the suggested within ones consenting memory, hence burdening oneself aka repressing self through oppression by others...all consensual.
where their arrogance comes from
AR'ROGANCE, noun [Latin arrogantia, from arrogo, to claim; of ad and rogo, to beg, or desire.]...that describes the many who claim the "truth" while begging for more desired definitions from the few, whose orders they're following.
Ones choice of want over need represents claiming over sustaining aka holding onto other partials (living) instead of resisting whole (process of dying).
The many represent the arrogant, while the few represent the insolent reaction to arrogance.
occultism
Consenting to suggested -ism gives those suggesting the power to withhold, conceal, hide the suggested (occult). Meanwhile; nature reveals everything perceivable to everyone perceiving it. Concealment implies ones mind (ment) choosing to conceal self from perceivable (need) by choosing to ignore it for suggested (want).
Apparently you've been living under a rock the last 5 years or are militantly ignorant like a tranny who is "ignorant" of basic biology. You aren't here to have an honest discussion, you're a censorious religious zealot.
You have too many posts about "Russian bots" and fucking children to be here having an honest discussion. If you read your religious texts you would realize YOU are the "conservative" who cannot stand legitimate debate.
I'm not wasting my time jumping through your hoops, you pedophile
You have "called out " nothing. You've simply thrown a childish conniption fit. You are the "conservative oppressor" your religion dictates must be overthrown. You cannot stand legitimate debate of the facts. You have become what you claim to be fighting against.
(((chaim mordecai))) aka "Karl marx" a direct descendant of Rothschild just like greta thunberg was not an original thinker. The "dialectic" often ascribed to Hegel was influenced by jean jack Rousseau, Comte, Fichte, and then to Hegel from enlightenment philosophers. The Rothschild known as "Marx" took high minded German philosophy and twisted it to justify raping and murdering everyone who wasn't in their priest class aka a bolshevist jew. For "progress"
The alchemical principle of thesis, antithesis, solution ( I forget the term) is a Christian triad of father , son, and the holy spirit. Mirrored perfectly in the marxist version of problem, reaction, solution. What "Marx" called "concretize". As Lenin said to accelerate the dichotomies to progress the dialectic.
"Marx" was not an original thinker. In his words he took Hegel and inverted him (satanic inversion) and made the philosophical "material" because he was a materialist. In other words he found a philosophy which fit with sabbatean satanic inversion giving a justification to rape and murder all non-jews.
b) thesis represents suggested information, which tempts others to consent by wanting or not wanting it.
c) consenting (want or not want) to suggested causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want), hence a conflict (antithesis) about suggested (thesis).
d) after consenting to suggested, those suggesting gain the power (of consent) to define, refine and contradict the suggested meaning at will, hence tempting both thesis and antithesis with suggested solutions to their problems.
e) DIALECTICS, noun - "that branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning"....suggestion represents the weapon to divide the consenting many into reasoning.(Georgia Guidestones - "let this be an age of reason")
f) before want (suggested) exists need (perceivable)...choosing want (fiction) ignores need (reality)...consenting to suggested fiction allows those suggesting it to shape it as an overlay upon ones perspective of reality.
g) solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life)...problems (living) need to resist being dissolved by solution (process of dying).
Your feelings on the subject are irrelevant. Fact of the matter is dialectical materialism, "cultural marxism" or more accurately race marxism is responsible for the death of hundreds of millions of men women and children by foreign invaders in the name of creating a globalist utopian pipedream completely divorced from reality.
Ever wonder why Jan 6er grandmas are still in solitary confinement for a glorified tour of the capital while antifa burned cities for months up to the election and called themselves "mostly peaceful"? Why do they pretend to know the best course of humanity towards "progress"? Why is fucking children "progressive"? Why they say being "assigned a gender at birth" is oppression?
Because marxism is a religious cult based on proto-christian gnostic doctrine. The idea that the soul is trapped in this universe by an evil God to toil is the same as being trapped in the wrong body by an evil doctor. Everything needs to be "oppression" for them to emulate their deity which is Satan cast out of heaven.
They literally believe they are gods. This is why they "know" better than you. This is where their arrogance comes from. This is an ancient religion repackaged to worship the state in place of God. This is why they are so attached to "new age" occultism, it's just old occultism with a new coat of paint. The old religious practices will be re-established under the cover of "woke".
a) because the few suggest progressivism, while the many consent to follow, which allows the few to misdirect the many.
b) if knowledge implies "perceivable", then those who don't ignore it for "suggested" know the only course for life...from inception towards death, hence being resistance within progression.
Progression (inception towards death) destroys children (life)...fucking (lust) feeds progression. Therefore...progression equals temptation and needs to be resisted.
Because GENeration (process of dying) implies division into regeneration (living), hence SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female".
Ignoring generated division (perceivable differences) for suggested sameness (any ideology, in this case gender) tempts one to ignore the sustenance of self by "expression" (growth within loss through resistance). Those who ignore to express are repressing themselves, which implies that what they consent to believe (gender-ideology) represents oppressive thoughts aka the burden of impositions.
Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents contract law, "-ism" represents the sales-pitch to gain consent to suggested, hence binding consenting choice to suggesting choice, which then allows those suggesting to cultivate the behavior of those consenting.
GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + DOCTRINE, noun [Latin , to teach.] implies teaching (doctrine) oneself by adapting to perceivable inspiration (knowledge).
Ignoring this by consenting to suggested Gnosticism (or any other -ism) allows others to indoctrinate one with suggested information.
Everything perceivable is "impressing" upon each one perceiving it from within, which when consented to allows to express growth (living) within impressing loss (process of dying).
Ignoring perceivable for suggested, accumulates all the suggested within ones consenting memory, hence burdening oneself aka repressing self through oppression by others...all consensual.
AR'ROGANCE, noun [Latin arrogantia, from arrogo, to claim; of ad and rogo, to beg, or desire.]...that describes the many who claim the "truth" while begging for more desired definitions from the few, whose orders they're following.
Ones choice of want over need represents claiming over sustaining aka holding onto other partials (living) instead of resisting whole (process of dying).
The many represent the arrogant, while the few represent the insolent reaction to arrogance.
Consenting to suggested -ism gives those suggesting the power to withhold, conceal, hide the suggested (occult). Meanwhile; nature reveals everything perceivable to everyone perceiving it. Concealment implies ones mind (ment) choosing to conceal self from perceivable (need) by choosing to ignore it for suggested (want).
Who exactly are you referring to?
Apparently you've been living under a rock the last 5 years or are militantly ignorant like a tranny who is "ignorant" of basic biology. You aren't here to have an honest discussion, you're a censorious religious zealot.
Can you name one of these grannies who is in solitary confinement?
You have too many posts about "Russian bots" and fucking children to be here having an honest discussion. If you read your religious texts you would realize YOU are the "conservative" who cannot stand legitimate debate.
I'm not wasting my time jumping through your hoops, you pedophile
You are very fast to make grandiose claims but always get really offended when your bullshit gets called out.
Pathetic.
You have "called out " nothing. You've simply thrown a childish conniption fit. You are the "conservative oppressor" your religion dictates must be overthrown. You cannot stand legitimate debate of the facts. You have become what you claim to be fighting against.
So, which granny is sitting in solitary confinement?
Why can't you name one?
Damn these time traveling Marx and Engels
(((chaim mordecai))) aka "Karl marx" a direct descendant of Rothschild just like greta thunberg was not an original thinker. The "dialectic" often ascribed to Hegel was influenced by jean jack Rousseau, Comte, Fichte, and then to Hegel from enlightenment philosophers. The Rothschild known as "Marx" took high minded German philosophy and twisted it to justify raping and murdering everyone who wasn't in their priest class aka a bolshevist jew. For "progress"
The alchemical principle of thesis, antithesis, solution ( I forget the term) is a Christian triad of father , son, and the holy spirit. Mirrored perfectly in the marxist version of problem, reaction, solution. What "Marx" called "concretize". As Lenin said to accelerate the dichotomies to progress the dialectic.
"Marx" was not an original thinker. In his words he took Hegel and inverted him (satanic inversion) and made the philosophical "material" because he was a materialist. In other words he found a philosophy which fit with sabbatean satanic inversion giving a justification to rape and murder all non-jews.
a) hegelian dialectic
b) thesis represents suggested information, which tempts others to consent by wanting or not wanting it.
c) consenting (want or not want) to suggested causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want), hence a conflict (antithesis) about suggested (thesis).
d) after consenting to suggested, those suggesting gain the power (of consent) to define, refine and contradict the suggested meaning at will, hence tempting both thesis and antithesis with suggested solutions to their problems.
e) DIALECTICS, noun - "that branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning"....suggestion represents the weapon to divide the consenting many into reasoning.(Georgia Guidestones - "let this be an age of reason")
f) before want (suggested) exists need (perceivable)...choosing want (fiction) ignores need (reality)...consenting to suggested fiction allows those suggesting it to shape it as an overlay upon ones perspective of reality.
g) solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life)...problems (living) need to resist being dissolved by solution (process of dying).
You fail at basic math.
You fail to understand what "marxism" is. This problem goes back to at least Aristotle.
Time traveling Marx would make a fun videogame
If you think raping and murdering Christian children is "fun", then sure.
Marxism is a retarded ideology but I highly doubt that Marx ever raped and murdered children.
Your feelings on the subject are irrelevant. Fact of the matter is dialectical materialism, "cultural marxism" or more accurately race marxism is responsible for the death of hundreds of millions of men women and children by foreign invaders in the name of creating a globalist utopian pipedream completely divorced from reality.