33 a's in a row is statistically impossible to have happened in nature.
Who said otherwise? It’s already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
Eat shit and die, by the way. You provided zero evidence for your claims, so they’re being dismissed with similar evidence. Opposition to sourceless nonsense is the exact opposite of what bots do. You don’t even deserve the dignity of recognition for that spam.
This is textbook pareidolia.
Dude, he called it a cell. LOL
He obviously knows his biochemistry!
Still, that's pretty laughable.
Great argument.
Who said otherwise? It’s already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
Nope. Made of existing organisms.
Eat shit and die, by the way. You provided zero evidence for your claims, so they’re being dismissed with similar evidence. Opposition to sourceless nonsense is the exact opposite of what bots do. You don’t even deserve the dignity of recognition for that spam.