thousands of words vs one picture
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Or it could just be a small act to steer the simulation in our favor.
a) wanting to steer the dis-favorable simulation implies "reacting" to suggested, while ignoring being acted upon by perceivable.
b) the few suggest simulation aka SIMILIS (alike) -ATION (through action) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being a different reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying).
c) the few suggest favoritism (friendly disposition) to tempt each one of the many to ignore ones position as partial (living) within whole (process of dying) hence detached from other ones, not attached by affection (friend)...unless ignored.
One doesn't need friends...wanting or not wanting suggested friends, shapes the want (friend) versus not want (foe) conflict of reason, hence shaping enemies.
d) if look at the picture and consider who suggested the goys to use money, and to pay money for their wishes, then you can see the jew reaping what he sowed. All by consent.
Good point. Nose money bait.
But, Some of that coin could be a small act of "money is not my God" dropped by someone thinking of something they love. Could send our path in a different direction for all we know.
COIN, noun - "money stamped" aka a mark upon M-ONE-Y (my one). Those who ignore perceivable value for suggested values are being marked by the authority of others. Those who utilize coins without authority represent counterfeit.
In short...those who consent to suggested coins ignore being within perceivable.
One represents the reaction (choice) within small/large (balance).
a) resisting suggested money as ones God doesn't work when spending it for suggested wishing-wells.
From a different perspective...the want of money turning into not wanting money anymore, while exchanging what one not wants (money) for what one wants next (wishes)...that all represents ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). That one is either gonna come back to spend more money on wishes, or goes back to money based on unfulfilled wishes. A gambler addicted to losing.
b) love implies versus hate aka a rebranding of wanting (love) vs not wanting (hate) suggested...a conflict of reason. The more one loves (want), the more others are tempted to hate (not want)...both ignore being the choice within balance (need/want).
One path (inception towards death) for each one within (life)...suggested directions tempt one to ignore this. Furthermore, suggested "our" and "we" (plural) tempts the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
Good stuff. Never seen a wishing well as just another joo greed pit before.
Jesus, how many times do I have to block this bot.
Suggesting dehumanization (block this bot) in the name of (Jesus); while branding oneself as the penis of Michelle Obama...