a) suggested utopianism (nowhere) tempts one to ignore everything perceivable, hence being within everywhere.
b) suggested negation (stop thrust) tempts one to ignore being expression (living) within impressing (process of dying). One cannot negate the perceivable natural order...only ignore it for suggested orders.
c) through implies from whole through partial, hence internal motion...both suggested utopia and negation tempt one to ignore this.
to destroy reality by removing
a) perceivable reality (process of dying) builds (inception) and destroys (death) everything living within.
b) removing implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
c) the few suggest the many to seek "order out of chaos", which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (partial) within wholeness (whole) by resisting (living) temptation (dying).
barriers of distinction
Nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). The partials perceive the perceivable whole as moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation as to sustain self while struggling to be dissolved.
The few suggest the inversion of perceivable apartheid...togetherness. Hence, e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united nations; united states; european union; uniformity; university; unity, ubisoft, universal studios, universal basic income; unicef or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) or Liberté (free), égalité (same), fraternité (together) etc.
In short...the more one consents to put suggested together, the less one can distinct perceivable differences.
Sleight of hand...a suggested puzzle (partial) tempts one to ignore the perceivable picture on the box (whole), hence tempting one to put together (suggested) what's already there (perceivable).
logos vs gnosticism
a) GNOS'TIC, noun nostic. [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...consenting to suggested -ISM tempts one to ignore perceivable GNOSTIC.
b) suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable PATHO (suffering) GENESIS (generation) aka suffering (living) within generation (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self temporarily within the ongoing.
Furthermore, the suggested word tempts one to ignore perceivable sound. Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in-sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound.
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested words for definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.
It's been a while since I checked his work, thanks for the heads up!
will check out
a) suggested utopianism (nowhere) tempts one to ignore everything perceivable, hence being within everywhere.
b) suggested negation (stop thrust) tempts one to ignore being expression (living) within impressing (process of dying). One cannot negate the perceivable natural order...only ignore it for suggested orders.
c) through implies from whole through partial, hence internal motion...both suggested utopia and negation tempt one to ignore this.
a) perceivable reality (process of dying) builds (inception) and destroys (death) everything living within.
b) removing implies RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by).
c) the few suggest the many to seek "order out of chaos", which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (partial) within wholeness (whole) by resisting (living) temptation (dying).
Nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). The partials perceive the perceivable whole as moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation as to sustain self while struggling to be dissolved.
The few suggest the inversion of perceivable apartheid...togetherness. Hence, e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united nations; united states; european union; uniformity; university; unity, ubisoft, universal studios, universal basic income; unicef or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) or Liberté (free), égalité (same), fraternité (together) etc.
In short...the more one consents to put suggested together, the less one can distinct perceivable differences.
Sleight of hand...a suggested puzzle (partial) tempts one to ignore the perceivable picture on the box (whole), hence tempting one to put together (suggested) what's already there (perceivable).
a) GNOS'TIC, noun nostic. [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...consenting to suggested -ISM tempts one to ignore perceivable GNOSTIC.
b) suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable PATHO (suffering) GENESIS (generation) aka suffering (living) within generation (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self temporarily within the ongoing.
Furthermore, the suggested word tempts one to ignore perceivable sound. Example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore "in-sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound.
Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who consent to suggested words for definitions represent DEAF-PHONETICIANS.