Ike and the Alien Ambassadors
(web.archive.org)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
If anyone likes UFOs and doesn't want to read bad news, stop now. Okay, you had your chance....
I've recently developed reservations about all the high-profile UFO incidents like this one, Roswell, the Battle of LA, Betty and Barney Hill, etc,, that they were all government fabrications. The mere fact that this story was printed in WaPo now convinces me I was right. The overall purpose, if you're wondering, is for Project Blue Beam predictive programming and to disguise the real UFO phenomenon. And c'mon, these fucks never met a lie they didn't like.
Am I being too harsh on WaPo? I don't think so. The intent is as transparent as someone who says, "I'm no gossip, but I'll just tell you what I heard." Okay. Actually, I like Michael Salla and believe he's authentic, I just think he's wrong about a great number of things. That makes him a perfect tool to use for disinfo purposes.
If anyone read this and is disappointed, I am too. I just cannot stomach all the deception floating around and had to get it off my chest.
I simply posted this here because it was a well achieved link to a major news outlet.
Right, I understand that.
The notable aspect that I found is that WaPo, a major news source, prints this lengthy commentary from Michael Salla whom few have heard of, but nothing of what, say, Putin would like to say about the conflict in Ukraine. That's absurd, is it not? We should attempt to explain to ourselves why they would do that.
In other words, there are things to be learned from a story about Ike and UFOs over and above things about Ike and UFOs.
My reservation there is with the provenance of that particular part of the Byrd narrative. I never expended the effort to look into exactly who said what and when about the "Inner Earth" stuff, but I would consider that an important part of validating it.
I tread carefully in this way because I stumbled across the fact that "They" added a huge section to the Roswell narrative as late as 1993. And the thing is, no one else seems to have noticed. They regard it as if it was always part of the storyline.
IDK if it's something you'd be interested in, but the post lost me at the very first claim:
I've never written it up, but if you pull all the pieces together you find out the Trinity test was faked, as were Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as was Operation Crossroads, as was the Roswell Incident.
That sounds like a tall claim until you find out all of these are tied to a single man, and he's tied directly to the CIA. I consider myself more creative than average, but I couldn't make it up if I tried. Nor would I try, even in a work of fiction, because no one would suspend disbelief.
I mean, I get what you're saying but there are levels of discernment:
No one ever said it was going to be easy to get to the truth, and in my personal experience it isn't.
They don't lie about everything. In fact, I am often shocked at what they state plainly. I think, "Why don't they lie about this, mislead, cover it up? I sure would." Then I think, "Guess they're lazy and incompetent because they know no ones paying attention anyway."
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/10zah4s/ufos_swarmed_the_capitol_in_1952_then_eisenhower/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2004/02/19/ike-and-the-alien-ambassadors/4698e544-1dc8-4573-8b8d-2b48d2a6305e/
https://archive.is/ByqCc