There is a dedicated community on this website for Flat Earth [FE] stuff:
https://scored.co/c/flatearthresearch/new
There is no need for FE here on conspiracies IMO. If people want to explore FE they can easily seek it there or elsewhere on the internet.
My position: FE doesn't belong here. I believe the proponents of FE are ruining any chance this forum has to gain a larger following. They are time wasters and trolls who reject logical and reasonable rebuttable of their assertions. If someone disproves their idea they say it's lies and fakery without justification or evidence. If it's tiresome for me it must be annoying for others too, and perhaps it is dissuading lurkers from taking the leap and interacting here. No one should have to spend time wading through FE madness if they didn't seek it out.
My position wont change through argument. That's not what this post is about. I want to know:
Do individual, regular users on Conspiracies support banning FE posts and "discussion" from this forum?
If this motion of mine passes, the FE users would be allowed to stay, but submissions they make claiming the Earth is flat would be removed and result in a 3 day ban.
Comments arguing for FE would be removed too, if they are reported or I see them.
A note on the side bar would be added, making it clear that FE is banned here, and a link to the scored/communities FE community provided.
I think that's fair.
Since voting is easily manipulated, the way we'll decide is this:
Reply below, a top level comment, with either a YAY or NAY
YAY= I want FE banned
NAY= I want FE allowed
1 vote per user
Caveats:
-
Any top level comment without a clear YAY or NAY at the beginning of the comment will be removed.
-
YAYS or NAYS as a reply to a top level comment will not count and will be removed.
-
Provide justification, opinions or suggestions about all this along with your vote, if you like, but place it on a separate line below your YAY or NAY.
-
Replying to users is fine too, as long as you yourself have also made a top level comment with a yay or nay.
-
If a top level comment is edited, the edit history will be checked and the comment may not count or may be removed.
-
We have about 100 regular users/contributors, my estimate, so I hope everyone replies with a YAY or NAY. We'll give it plenty of time to ensure everyone sees this post.
-
Upvotes or Downvotes on comments or on this post will be completely ignored
We're counting YAYs or NAYs from individual users only.
-
Top level comments without a clear YAY or NAY will be removed.
-
Duplicate YAYs or NAYS will be removed.
-
Handshake account YAYs or NAYs are welcome, but they will be scrutinized and possibly ignored if they seem like sock-puppets, regardless of how they are voting. This is to ensure the minimum of vote manipulation.
-
Older accounts with little to no history - or where their last comment was several months or years ago - will also be scrutinized and may not count.
I reserve the right to edit this post based on interactions and suggestions below. I may not have thought of everything. Edits will be labelled and placed at the end of this text.
EDIT
Vote over
Minus sock-puppet accounts it's 61 Nay, 44 Yay.
Most of the nays are casual, non-contributing users banging on about censorship and free speech who don't give a damn about quality content nor FE. I encourage those users to engage with FE instead of ignoring it. If you did that you would probably come to regret voting to allow it in this forum.
Yay.
Marxist subverters change the meaning of words to suit their purpose. Marcus' repressive tolerance turns "Banning topics" or "censorship" into letting them flood boards with gibberish. They say black people's lives matter but take that to justify genocide of whites. They say "love is love" to justify child grooming and abuse of small children. MAGA granny's are still political prisoners because the feds took them on a guided tour on 1/6 while antifa burned cities for months leading up to the election but those were "mostly peaceful", of course Soros backed DAs let them out of jail immediately. This is "repressive tolerance". This is communism.
Banning topics IS a slippery slope, but the people who would argue for their right to drown out legitimate discussion with faux intellectual poppycock and pleas to emotion are the ones who would censor you in a heartbeat.
EVERY SINGLE TIME the media tries to discredit "conspiracy theorists" they ALWAYS bring up flat earth, why? The media is ran by feds. Flat earth accounts are ran by feds to discredit us.
I am a big proponent of hollow earth, not a devotee of a faith like the feds act with FE. Admiral Byrds account of operation high jump can be called crazy but they cannot say it's wrong, which is exactly why they attack with guilt by association.
Flat earth feds would say "you're questioning the shape of the planet too, what's the difference?" I'm actually not. Anyone that has used a map can verify the difference between a flat map and a round globe by going on a hike for a few miles and not accounting for the angle of declination. If you do not account for the difference between your flat map and the round earth with very simple math you will get lost fast.
I've said it before and I will keep saying it. Flat earthers are "just asking questions" with all the sincerity of questioning if Trump is owned by Russia again, and again, and again, and again, and again.