I'm just saying, if they got the same result without the antigen, then chicken eggs are "good". Maybe just against the flu. If you are saying there is no flu, then chicken eggs are probably just good and keep down exosome production.
The main point I'm getting at is the reason they would want to cut the egg supply. Perhaps this is just an excuse to hide that something in eggs neutralizes the VACCINES.
But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.
SARS-CoV-2 (100PFU) was incubated with an equal volume of Pre-IgY, S-2-IgY and Remdesivir in different concentration gradients in VeroE6 cells. The results showed that different doses of S-IgY had an obvious inhibitory effect on the cellular SARS-CoV-2 content (copy number) with EC50 of 27.78 ± 1.54 nM. Remdesivir’s EC50 against SARS-CoV-2 was 3259 ± 159.62 nM,
The inhibitory effect of S-IgY on SARS-Cov-2 replication was 106 times stronger more than that of Remdesivir In vitro (Fig.7.)."
They do not give values for how potent the Pre-IgY immunoglobulin is!
Remunder that chickens have been given vaccines since the 1970s, who knows what they have been injecting them with (besides the mareks vaccine) and how it affects the eggs and meat
No it isn't.
Did you read the article?
This isn't about naturwlly occuring antibodies.
Did they try the egg antibodies without the introduction of the antigen?
Maybe the antigen doesn't matter.
Was there a control shown in that regard, since you read the whole article?
If there is no virus causing Covid how can they produce antibodies against it?
I'm not saying there is.
I'm just saying, if they got the same result without the antigen, then chicken eggs are "good". Maybe just against the flu. If you are saying there is no flu, then chicken eggs are probably just good and keep down exosome production.
The main point I'm getting at is the reason they would want to cut the egg supply. Perhaps this is just an excuse to hide that something in eggs neutralizes the VACCINES.
Read the fucking study.
Wait, you said you did!
So was there a control? I don't have the time to read it.
I know, that's why I called him out.
But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.
I did read it. There is no control.
"5.2 qRT-PCR
SARS-CoV-2 (100PFU) was incubated with an equal volume of Pre-IgY, S-2-IgY and Remdesivir in different concentration gradients in VeroE6 cells. The results showed that different doses of S-IgY had an obvious inhibitory effect on the cellular SARS-CoV-2 content (copy number) with EC50 of 27.78 ± 1.54 nM. Remdesivir’s EC50 against SARS-CoV-2 was 3259 ± 159.62 nM,
The inhibitory effect of S-IgY on SARS-Cov-2 replication was 106 times stronger more than that of Remdesivir In vitro (Fig.7.)."
They do not give values for how potent the Pre-IgY immunoglobulin is!
Yes I did. Did you?
Remunder that chickens have been given vaccines since the 1970s, who knows what they have been injecting them with (besides the mareks vaccine) and how it affects the eggs and meat
If there is no virus causing Covid how can they prevent it?