I'm just saying, if they got the same result without the antigen, then chicken eggs are "good". Maybe just against the flu. If you are saying there is no flu, then chicken eggs are probably just good and keep down exosome production.
The main point I'm getting at is the reason they would want to cut the egg supply. Perhaps this is just an excuse to hide that something in eggs neutralizes the VACCINES.
But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.
Did they try the egg antibodies without the introduction of the antigen?
Maybe the antigen doesn't matter.
Was there a control shown in that regard, since you read the whole article?
If there is no virus causing Covid how can they produce antibodies against it?
I'm not saying there is.
I'm just saying, if they got the same result without the antigen, then chicken eggs are "good". Maybe just against the flu. If you are saying there is no flu, then chicken eggs are probably just good and keep down exosome production.
The main point I'm getting at is the reason they would want to cut the egg supply. Perhaps this is just an excuse to hide that something in eggs neutralizes the VACCINES.
Read the fucking study.
Wait, you said you did!
So was there a control? I don't have the time to read it.
I know, that's why I called him out.
But my point is valid, that they are disappearing eggs for a reason. It could be what I said in the other comment (they are good against the virus OR vaccine), and another possibility is that so they can introduce agents that sterilize humans.
It is known that the chicken feed renders chicken sterile. Maybe they are trying to get it so the chickens don't get sterile but the people do.