Respectfully.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
I...no words.
*edit: Ok that wasn't fair. Honestly there's no reason, if the earth is a plane, that they couldn't have played with the letters like that. Kind of a neat idea actually.
a) did the perceivable plane exist before one can suggest the letters "PLANE" as a description thereof?
b) what if suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound?
Could the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound)?
c) does perceivable nature brand itself or do those within nature suggest brands to each other to gain control over the definitions of those brands? What if those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound), while those consenting to suggested definitions (words) represent DEAF PHONETICIANS?
d) what if consenting to suggested (words) over perceivable (sound) gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested definitions at will?
a) No implies versus Yes...a conflict of reason.
b) what if the few suggest no, not, nothing...to tempt each perceiving one of the many to ignore perceivable everything?
How does one sell nothing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI By choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law.
So NASA is producing the show about nothing!? I think you may have something here.
Do you know why...because people like to say NASA. https://pic8.co/sh/nrEXy1.jpg