Meet a Monster - Directed Evolution
(www.nobelprize.org)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Watch the latest episode of Nova.
This woman believes she is helping the world by directing evolution to change the way nature works.
What have we learned in just about every instance where this kind of arrogance and ignorance has damaged the natural world or life?
"WE NEVER ASKED IF WE SHOULD".
What if temporary chaos (living) cannot damage the ongoing natural order (process of dying)...only oneself by ignoring the need to resist the perceivable natural order for the want to follow suggested artificial orders?
You got me there and you are way to smart for me.
Simple ol me says that nature worked to get us here and we should respect natural evolution. I believe by forcing nature's hand, we can produce outcomes that we didn't intend and can be our destruction, which is fine with me, but others may feel differently.
As for
a) If EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power", then "here" implies as formed growth (life) within the momentum (balance) of flowing loss (inception towards death), hence representing the internal powers of loss (velocity) and growth (resistance) in balance with each other. Why? For the sustenance of energy, which internally differentiates itself from ongoing whole (loss) into temporary partial (growth) through momentum (balance of motion).
b) suggested "us" (plural) tempts each "one" (singular) to ignore being partial (perceiving ones) within whole (perceivable oneness). Others suggest togetherness as the inversion of perceivable apartheid.
Sleight of hand..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE or "Arbeit macht Frei" aka WORK (energy) will set you FREE (free will of choice). Choice represents the reacting power within balance (momentum of motion) as the enacting power, and since action generates reaction....it goes different reactors (living) within same generator (process of dying).
The few tempt the many to ignore this by suggesting "actors" under "directors", hence tempting the many to consent to mimic suggested acting, instead of reacting to perceivable.
a) to believe implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable. Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
The industrialization of contract law for mass population control is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew". The natural bond represents balance/choice, while choice/choice represents artificially binding oneself to another.
b) living within the process of dying implies within the force of ongoing velocity, and as the force of temporary resistance, hence each ones struggle (Mein Kampf) to resist (living) temptation (process of dying).
The few suggest orders to tempt the consenting many to follow, while each one of the many ignores to be the resistance within the perceivable natural order.
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
b) inception predefines death as the outcome of life.
c) life represents the reaction (resistance) to enacting origin (velocity)...others tempt one to ignore this for suggested outcomes, which when consented to, gives others the power to shape ones hope/fear towards outcomes.
d) to be (growth) implies within (loss). The few suggest the many to seek order out of chaos, which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (growth) within ongoing order (loss).
a) "others" implies different from oneself. One can only perceive moving differences (perceivable inspiration for adaptation)...others suggest sameness as the inversion thereof...e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) or united states; united nations, european union; uniformity etc.
b) feelings aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempts one to ignore being (living) moved by (process of dying). The few utilize suggestion of for example fear/hope to evoke emotions among the many.
a) suggested "is is nothing" tempts one to ignore being the perceiving (partial) within perceivable everything (whole).
b) only within ongoing natural order (velocity) can there be balance (momentum) for temporary chaos (resistance within velocity) to have "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom.
c) the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka flow to form (inception), form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)... temporary ingredient (chaos) within, out of and in response to ongoing base (order)...basic alchemy.
The process of dying represents the ongoing need, each one living within represents the temporary choice to want to ignore need, hence being choice at the center of perceivable balance (need/want), which the few tempt through suggestion towards imbalance (want vs not want).
In short...motion represents order, any reaction within represents chaos with the choice to adapt to (need) or ignore (want) order.
From a different perspective...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by, out of and in response to perceivable sound as the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
The trick...suggested fiction (word) over perceivable reality (sound) aka spell-craft. Those adapting to sound represents PHONETICIANS (from phonics, sound), while those who ignore it for suggested words are being fooled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS.
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original or model proposed for imitation"...the whole differentiates itself into partials, which communicates the perceivable whole as moving differences (inspiration) to each perceiving partial.
Ones choice to adapt as partial to the perceivable inspiration by the whole; allows one to grow comprehension about perceivable exponentially...or one chooses to ignore it for suggested information by others, who then gain through ones consent the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will.
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Everyone "knows" (perceives) everything (perceivable), yet each one lacks comprehension about what the perceivable means, hence representing the temporary opportunity to grow (comprehension) within loss (perceivable inspiration) or ignore it for whatever the other dipshits are suggesting.
b) beyond implies BE (to be within) + YOND, adjective - "alienated in mind; gone wandering" aka to be within perceivable, while being alienated in mind/ gone wandering within suggested.
Work implies energy (inherent/internal power); aka the origin of self sustenance, hence not efficiency (effect) but causality (cause)...being at the center (partial choice) of energy (whole balance); while struggling to sustain self represents the effect (living) of the cause (process of dying).
CHAOS, noun - "confusion; mixed mass; disorder"...hence ones ignorance (want) of ongoing order (need) represents temporary chaos, yet order always prevails.
I genuinely wish I could understand what you are saying. I am familiar with your comments as I have followed :Russell-Jay; Gould a bit, but it is beyond me.
Thanks for your input anyway.
That represents the issue...wanting (wish) to stand under (understand) suggested information, instead of the need to grow (comprehension) within perceivable inspiration.
As long as you choose to want to understand, you will "stand under" those who suggest you what reality means...that's all fiction. Perceivable reality exists before anyone within can shape a suggestion about it. There is sound before a word can be shaped within, there is symmetry before symbolism can be shaped within, and there is flow (inception towards death) before form (life) can be shaped within.
Choosing want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) represents the foundation for "ignorance" and ignoring perceivable implies lack of self discernment within perceivable and lack of comprehension about perceivable, and since ignorance represents ones free will of choice (want over need)...it's willingly.
Only oneself can choose to grow self instead of standing under others.
Thanks for the inspiration.
Resist "yond" and embrace "being"....
Lizard neck
DIRECTED (inception towards death) EVOLVO (unfolding of life) -TION (though action)....nobel by descent.