The notion of “Clovis First”, that 14,000 years ago one group crossed the Bering Land-Bridge then populated all of the americas, is just laughable. What’s sick is that for all intents and purposes it’s still the default world view.
Can't believe that I remembered this, but the dude Ramon Riley, an Apache, says that if there was a migration, it was the other way around. And there's linguistic evidence of it too. But I read about that a long time ago.
I couldn't read the article, but I have wondered how old something like Bohemian Grove really is. At least the owl rock formation. Might've been there a LONG time.
There’s evidence man was on the Americas as early as 130,000 years ago:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/science/prehistoric-humans-north-america-california-nature-study.html
The notion of “Clovis First”, that 14,000 years ago one group crossed the Bering Land-Bridge then populated all of the americas, is just laughable. What’s sick is that for all intents and purposes it’s still the default world view.
Can't believe that I remembered this, but the dude Ramon Riley, an Apache, says that if there was a migration, it was the other way around. And there's linguistic evidence of it too. But I read about that a long time ago.
I couldn't read the article, but I have wondered how old something like Bohemian Grove really is. At least the owl rock formation. Might've been there a LONG time.
You mean...the one I linked? Lol
Even if a society did cross there.
How did they migrate down to south America to become to most advanced society in the west?
Why were the incas and Aztecs so advanced but the north American tribes so not.
They would be the old more established if they all came from the north.
Must go mountains and worship human sacrifices