evidence of abrasion included frayed and unraveling portions of the cable’s armor and vertical grooves in the rock apparently cut by the cable. The greatest incision and armor damage occurred on ledges between spans in irregular rock outcrop areas. Unlike the nearshore rocky region, neither the rocks nor the cable appeared damaged along outcrops on Pioneer Seamount. Multiple loops of slack cable added during a 1997 cable repair operation were found lying flat on the seafloor. Several sharp kinks in the cable were seen at 240 m water depths in an area subjected to intense trawling activity. Most of the cable has become buried with time in sediment substrates on the continental shelf whereas much of the cable remains exposed in sediments at deeper depths. The cable is exposed in rocky environments of the nearshore region and on all of Pioneer Seamount. The main biological features associated with the cable were organisms utilizing the cable as substrate and occasionally as shelter. Considerable care was taken to count megafauna in video transects and macrofauna from the top 5 cm of push cores. Few differences were found between cable and control sites at the 95% confidence level. Anemones Metridium farcimen and Stomphia sp. colonized the cable and were more abundant in cable transects at most soft sediment sites. Coarse extrapolation of the transect data suggest that more than 5,000 M. farcimen may live on the continental shelf portion of the cable. Several other species of anemones living on the cable are common along deeper sections of the cable route. Where the cable was buried, the presence of linear rows of sea anemones proved to be a reliable indicator of the cable’s position. Flatfish and rockfish apparently congregate near the cable and were as much as 1 order of magnitude more abundant near the cable at some sites.
I have long wondered how they managed to stretch communications cables across the entire Atlantic or Pacific ocean.
I cannot say I know much about it. Just shared some of what I researched.
It would be interesting to find what percentage of internet traffic and communications occurs via these oceanic cables versus satellites.
I'm not convinced of flat earth theory or the dome, but I find these theories interesting at least. One thing that boggles my mind is that the earth and moon are supposedly both spinning, and the moon spinning around the earth, but we are to believe that they spin at some kind of absolutely perfect rate to guarantee we only ever see one side of the moon? That right there seems bogus to me.
I wonder if we could zoom in on sun and see if we are only seeing one side of the sun. perhaps by analyzing these "sunspots" and trying to identify patterns.
Jesus christ, you guys are fucking dumb. Have you no comprehension of how slow satellite internet is? Have you not researched the COST and the SPEED????
99.999% of all communications are using undersea cables because it's a fraction of the cost of launching and maintaining a satalight.
Fuck, you guys are beyond pathetic. Just lazy dolts who don't know shit.
One thing the video mentions that coincides with flat earth but is not overtly stated; the sea cables are layed out in a way that makes more sense on a flat earth map than on a globe. Notice the FE sea cable map in the video. For instance, there are no cables that run from Australia to South America because they are on opposite ends of the plane. Instead they are routed from Australia to West coast USA to South America. Also this video states that 99% of intercontinental communication takes place through these cables, and I've heard similar figures from other sources. Orbiting Satellites are completely unnecessary for our world wide network. Also a flat earth with a dome explains how radio frequencies can be transmitted from USA to AU, which should be inconceivable on a globe as the radio waves would have to bouce between the surface and the ionosphere many times to make it around the sphere.
Ya as a flat earther it's impossible to say what the sun and moon exactly are. I find it much easier to point out what they aren't. Perhaps if we had Nasa's budget we could get more difinitive answers lmao.
Guidelines on Best Environmental Practice (BEP) in Cable Laying and Operation https://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/2017/12-02e_agreement_cables_guidelines.pdf
Environmental Impact of a Submarine Cable: Case Study of the Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate (ATOC)/ Pioneer Seamount Cable https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253455724_Environmental_Impact_of_a_Submarine_Cable_Case_Study_of_the_Acoustic_Thermometry_of_Ocean_Climate_ATOC_Pioneer_Seamount_Cable
Sustainable Development:Submarine Cables In The Marine Environment https://www.ecomagazine.com/in-depth/sustainable-development-submarine-cables-in-the-marine-environment
Telecommunication line infrastructure and the Arctic environment: past, present and future https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/polar-record/article/abs/telecommunication-line-infrastructure-and-the-arctic-environment-past-present-and-future/85AB118A084835BF73BF1B063D9DD107
Do you draw any conclusions or speculation from this?
I have long wondered how they managed to stretch communications cables across the entire Atlantic or Pacific ocean.
I cannot say I know much about it. Just shared some of what I researched.
It would be interesting to find what percentage of internet traffic and communications occurs via these oceanic cables versus satellites.
I'm not convinced of flat earth theory or the dome, but I find these theories interesting at least. One thing that boggles my mind is that the earth and moon are supposedly both spinning, and the moon spinning around the earth, but we are to believe that they spin at some kind of absolutely perfect rate to guarantee we only ever see one side of the moon? That right there seems bogus to me.
I wonder if we could zoom in on sun and see if we are only seeing one side of the sun. perhaps by analyzing these "sunspots" and trying to identify patterns.
Jesus christ, you guys are fucking dumb. Have you no comprehension of how slow satellite internet is? Have you not researched the COST and the SPEED????
99.999% of all communications are using undersea cables because it's a fraction of the cost of launching and maintaining a satalight.
Fuck, you guys are beyond pathetic. Just lazy dolts who don't know shit.
Ya so why do you think satellites exist?
One thing the video mentions that coincides with flat earth but is not overtly stated; the sea cables are layed out in a way that makes more sense on a flat earth map than on a globe. Notice the FE sea cable map in the video. For instance, there are no cables that run from Australia to South America because they are on opposite ends of the plane. Instead they are routed from Australia to West coast USA to South America. Also this video states that 99% of intercontinental communication takes place through these cables, and I've heard similar figures from other sources. Orbiting Satellites are completely unnecessary for our world wide network. Also a flat earth with a dome explains how radio frequencies can be transmitted from USA to AU, which should be inconceivable on a globe as the radio waves would have to bouce between the surface and the ionosphere many times to make it around the sphere.
Ya as a flat earther it's impossible to say what the sun and moon exactly are. I find it much easier to point out what they aren't. Perhaps if we had Nasa's budget we could get more difinitive answers lmao.