Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
Jesus Throws Jews Out Of The Temple (youtu.be)
posted 3 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler 3 years ago by Vlad_The_Impaler +13 / -5
50 comments share
50 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You forgot Tacitus mentioning Jesus.

And of course you're going to have modern experts in dispute about something like the dating of the certain Bible writings in dispute, when the accepted date for a couple millennia would make for some uncomfortable conclusions to some of those experts.

I made another thread about Julian the Apostate. Put your silly snark about that over there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Tacitus had access to records you don't now, but he did, in the time he lived, including people who were alive at the time Jesus was. You know diddly about historical research.

If your point is that the Platonic Form of Jesus, let's call it, is different from what's in the record, then you're not getting any disagreement from me.

And people have been questioning the historical record of Jesus since the Jews murdered him, and this mostly stems from Jewish influence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Your response to a simple fact about historical research, about the availability of primary and secondary sources, is to say that is ALL historical research are the result of interpretations and historical records are unreliable?

Because of your inability to come to terms with some accepted facts, you're going all post modernist and saying it's all socially constructed. Interesting rejoinder to say the least. Entirely unproductive and ineffective as an argument, but sadly, hardly unique.

Do you have anything useful to write, besides the empirical equivalent of "if I didn't see it, then it didn't happen"?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy