The Boy with the Henna Tattoo
(youtu.be)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I just don't get humans that can do shit like this. Is it drug induced? Or is it some kind of learned behavior from generations of ritual abuse? Maybe I've lived too sheltered a life, but I don't understand how people end up going down a road like this. Knowing this is just the tip of the iceberg is a daunting realization.
"henna" means hair dye. If you are using it as a tattoo, it is not henna.
a) TATTOO; noun (Dutch taptoe) - "signal calling soldiers or sailors to quarters at night; figuratively say no more"
b) all words suggest meaning to those consenting to ignore predefined meaning (perceivable sound). Consenting to suggested words gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at will.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henna#Body_art
I'm aware of staining (dyeing)... STAIN, verb - "to blot; to soil; to spot with guilt or infamy; to tarnish; to bring reproach on" and of those who suggest "art" (artificial) to tempt others to ignore natural.
As the temporary (living) one needs to resist the ongoing (process of dying), not mimic it by trying to stain the temporary (body) with suggested permanence (tattoo).
The few suggest temporary body-art to tempt the many to want to hold onto it, hence a gateway-drug to permanent body-art. To re-balance this...embrace the moment when painter expresses upon living canvas, then wash it off to pay response-ability to ongoing origin...the naturally perceivable underneath the artificially suggested.
Your awareness is limited.
a) free will of choice can only exist within the boundaries (limit) of balance. Without balance (need/want)...no choice in-between.
b) LIM'IT, noun - "the part that terminates a thing"...a suggested inversion of the perceivable whole (process of dying) terminating each perceiving partial (living).
c) how would you expand awareness of body-art? Why stain the natural, while tempting self to hold onto the artificial? Why disguise appearances? Why worship the suggested symbolism instead of the perceivable symmetry...a symmetry in motion?
d) color implies "inherent within light", which also implies coexistence with darkness, so why put value on the colors, instead of evaluating the ongoing spectrum of colors, as the center spectator with the free will of choice to paint in-between light and darkness?
e) what is it about being ANOINT'ED - "rubbed with oil; set apart; consecrated with oil" that draws the many to the suggestions of others?
f) COSMETIC, adjective. [Greek; order, beauty.] implies the natural order...not artificial orders suggested by others.
You added nothing of value to this conversation.
a) everything (process of dying) gives (inception) and takes (dying) to and from everyone (living)...others suggest one to ADD, verb - "to set or put together, join or unite", hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one); tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; equality (sameness) through diversity (difference) etc.
b) perceivable (inspiration) represents value, suggested (information) represents ones ignorance to evaluate (perceiving) value, while tempting others to choose the same.
c) the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to believe someone can add something to everything already in existence. Meanwhile; nature setting itself apart; from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living) implies perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
What if one is tempted to want to converse (interchange of thoughts or opinions), which tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin (inspiration), while being INTER (internal aka within) CHANGED (being moved by)?
How about this...why are those tempted to abuse others also tempted to leave marks upon others? Furthermore; why are those in the position to abuse others, tempting others to mark themselves, hence choosing self-abuse?
You are a detriment to discourse.