On what basis would I make such a claim? That it's happened before? Do you suggest operating on the principle that everything that's happened before is permissible?
I reject that type of thinking lunacy, retardation, or both.It's also to be condemned as enabling many of the ills of this world. But you go ahead with displaying it, if it's all you can manage.
So you're criticizing Trump for failing to exceed the Constitution enough for your liking? Seems to be a bold position, but okay.
On what basis would I make such a claim? That it's happened before? Do you suggest operating on the principle that everything that's happened before is permissible?
I reject that type of thinking lunacy, retardation, or both.It's also to be condemned as enabling many of the ills of this world. But you go ahead with displaying it, if it's all you can manage.