Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
nato soledar update (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by HonestTruth 2 years ago by HonestTruth +4 / -1
11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– GodsWordIsTrue 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I wonder. I saw it on video, not at the theater when it first came out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Haha,,yeah, it goes from "ridiculous!" in December of 1997 to "oh yeah, of course" by January 1998. We get trifled with so easily. But it gets worse, and here's something you might find interesting.

First, I would suggest there should probably be no association with the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, since that didn't start until 15 months later.

But in any case, the "predictive programming" made sure we swallowed the scandal right when it came along. right? But how did they get the timing so good? How did they know when or even it was going to break? Mere coincidence? You wouldn't have to believe that if...

The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was faked (24-page PDF)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GodsWordIsTrue 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the link! It looks interesting. I've read some of Miles Matthis' articles but hadn't seen this one. I'm not sure what to make of his analysis. To me, he goes a bit overboard with speculation and the degree to which he says everything is faked. But maybe he's right on some things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Spoiler alert: What you say is correct and--way down at the end of the road--you figure out he's a disinfo agent, the highest level of which I know. You can search for and find a couple of people writing that up. It's gotten so bad that I stopped reading his work about the summer of 2019 with the Space Shuttle paper.

All that being said, his earlier work (with the exception of his very first paper on JFK) is very solid. Specifically, he surfaces a ton of little known evidence and breaks through a lot of "mental barriers", such as pointing out how many WW2-era photos are faked. And really, the "mental barriers" part is actually more important, because it opens you up to recognizing and properly interpreting the evidence on your own.

Well, you can see that this is a helluva long disclaimer to give and is going to scare a lot of people off, so I typically just leave it out... lol. I suppose my real point is just something like, "If I can expose someone to the idea that the deception is even grander and more audacious than they ever thought possible, they just might widen their horizons, and if they do that they'll start seeing more for themselves."

Glad you got something out of the link!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy