I understand the difference between superstition, numerology, semantics and gematria. They can be seen as levels of understanding.
Crowley was a fine example of how such forays can lead to madness, due to the infinite complexity that unfolds. Seeking, one can find most any conjecture confirmed and this in a magician, leads to a god complex in control.
I've developed a quip 'They aren't wrong'. This insinuates that the information is 'correct' in the way presented, but is missing something vital.
100 people will see something different in any one 'clue'.
Clew: A supposed ball of yarn or thread by which one could navigate the Labyrinth.
Disambiguation: Clue - origin: clew
Used in a sentence:
Knowing that the clew leads to the Minotaur, not out of the labyrinth, Daedelus fashioned wings for his son so he could fly OVER the whole grid
and see it from 40,000 ft.
This carries its own warning of flying 'too close to the sun'.
I see both as sister analogies of extremes in both exoteric and esoteric adventures.
The clew did NOT lead out of the labyrinth and Daedalus 'realized' it.
His first step towards escape. He had knowledge of the minotaur first and that was all the difference.
Forest for the trees is the modern analogy.
How and why were specific letters formed and chosen and united to form words?
Spirit of the law vs letter of the law.
Meaning is spirit not letter. Letter divides, spirit unites.
Spirit precedes words....to understand the spirit behind becomes the SHIELD against deception through words.
.A fish can describe the ocean all day and die of thirst.
Balance represents the level (even); choice represents the odds...understanding represents ones choice to stand under the suggested choices of others, hence imbalance.
the difference between
Being in-between (inception to death) implies being differentiated (living) through sameness (process of dying). Willingly ignoring this gives others the consent to utilize suggested superstition, numerology, semantics and gematria.
Crowley was a fine example of how such forays can lead to madness...
...according to those suggesting his-story.
can lead to madness
MAD, adjective - "disordered in intellect"...a) INTELLECT (Latin intelligo) - "to understand" represents standing under suggested, hence ignoring to resist the perceivable natural order, and disorder represents temporary chaos (living) to willingly ignore ongoing order (process of dying).
The few suggest intellect; intelligence; intel...to tempt the consenting many to disorder themselves by standing under suggested information.
To be (alive) implies being lead into (inception) and out of (death) temporary chaos through the ongoing natural order...so everything leads everyone back to order.
the infinite complexity that unfolds
Chasing suggested information into complexity grinds ones resistance down, hence the more complex the suggested, the dumber those consenting to it, which leads to the suggested crumbling upon them based on lack of potential to utilize or maintain it.
The few suggest "civilizations; nations, and societies" as narratives to distract the many from the suggested collapsing upon them, based on their consent to want more of it. From building the tower of babel (confusion; disorder) to fallen angles (consequences of ignorant choices cascading down the pyramid).
Seeking, one can find...
...because living implies being directed towards death, hence seeking wanted outcomes representing less needed resistance, hence "finding" faster.
one can find most any conjecture confirmed
CONJECTURE, noun - "casting or throwing together"...every suggested information represents conjecture, because it implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence casting a bond between choices together.
Meanwhile; everything perceivable represents moving differences (inspiration) aka different partials being moved apart from one another.
a God complex in control
a) the few suggest control from above to tempt the many to ignore being free (choice) at the center (balance).
b) suggested composition (more than one) tempts perceiving ones (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
c) consenting to suggested represents ignorance of being choice for submission to other choices. To distract from the contract law underneath, the few suggest control from above "in the name of", hence "e nomine"...patris (whole) et filii (partial) et spiritus sancti (adaptation of partial to whole).
I've developed a quip 'They aren't wrong'.
a) sarcasm is being suggested to distract comedy (living) from drama (process of dying).
b) are vs aren't and right vs wrong represents reasoning over suggested, hence implying ones consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) those comprehending reasoning utilize contradiction of whatever you suggest within a conflict of reason, as to keep you reasoning, while those lacking comprehension will either fortify their side within reason with whatever you suggested or demand you to choose a side instead of questioning theirs.
100 people will see something different in any one 'clue'.
a) because everyone within everything represents a different point of view.
b) Who? One! Which weapon? Choice! Where? Balance! One doesn't need suggested clues to solve anything, one needs to resist be dissolved by everything. The solution isn't hidden; those being dissolved by it, need to grow within it.
navigate the labyrinth
LAB, noun - "a great talker; a blabber"...hence without consenting to blabbering suggestions; the only perceivable path won't turn into a mental labyrinth of confusion.
Daedelus fashioned wings for his son so he could fly OVER the whole grid
Assistance for growth tempts ignorance of growing resistance within temptation. Hence the choice to accept (want) vs decline (not want) the suggested wings, or the need to learn to fly.
As for over the whole grid...no matter ones height, there can only be partials as far as the eye can see.
too close to the sun
Both "sun" and "son" represent one...not the material, but partial (material) within whole (immaterial). Too close to oneself represents ignoring perceivable outside (exoteric) for suggested upheld within (esoteric)...leading nonetheless to getting burned.
first step towards escape
a)each choice represents another first step within momentum. Each step shapes ones surrounding within everyone's path.
b) suggested escapism tempts towards outcome (dying), while ignoring the perceivable need to resist origin for prolonged sustenance (living).
He had knowledge of the minotaur first and that was all the difference.
Everyone has knowledge (the ability to perceive everything perceivable)..."minotaur" represents a suggested information tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration (moving differences).
Forest for the trees is the modern analogy.
a) suggesting that a forest is based upon amount of trees, when everything (loss) surrounding a forest (growth) is implied for the existence of the forest (Latin foris) - "outside".
b) ANAL'OGY, noun [Gr. ratio, proportion.] - "an agreement or likeness between things, when the things are otherwise entirely different"...each thing within everything represents a difference (a partial within whole). The agreement represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...a temptation.
How and why were specific letters formed and chosen and united to form words?
a) How? Free will of choice. Why? To tempt others to submit free will of choice to suggested, which allows those suggesting to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at their free will of choice.
b) LET'TER, noun [from let.] - "one who permits", hence choice (consent) permitting choice (suggestion) to contractually bind ones choice to suggested choices, hence from being free to being set free/let off the leash at liberty by others.
PERMIT', verb [Latin permitto; per and mitto, to send.]...the process of dying sends those living within, hence balance sending choice. The few suggest POST, noun [Latin postis, positus, pono, to place.] for the many to send letters...
c) suggested UNITED; U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity] - "one" tempts the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole) for suggested togetherness with other ones.
d) a letter represents suggested symbolism (meaning attached to brand), which represents the inversion of perceivable symmetry (form within flow aka moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation as to draw comprehension from).
Setting the former (symbolism) into the latter (symmetry) contradicts the temporary form with ongoing flow. This brings one to WORD, noun [Latin , to speak; that which is uttered or thrown out.] - "a combination of articulate and vocal sounds". Now one can artificially (by suggestion) combine uttered meanings, hence mimicking ongoing change. This allows those who suggest information to adapt to those who consent to ignore inspiration.
Spirit of the law vs letter of the law.
L-A-W aka Land Air Water...constituent parts (partial form) within a composition (whole flow).
SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] - "animal exitement" aka mind agitated through animation. That implies the need to adapt as the exited (living) to the animating (process of dying), while the suggested letter represents permission by others on how to react.
Meaning is spirit not letter.
Perceivable inspiration represents predefined meaning, suggesting others what "is" tempts one to ignore predefined meaning (all that was perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what is), while tempting others to exploit ignorance with suggested meaning.
Letter divides, spirit unites
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested letters shapes division (want vs not want).
b) all represents one (unit) in energy...the more the perceiving one adapts (spirit) to perceivable oneness, the more one comprehends oneness, hence being alone aka ALL(in)ONE.
c) the few suggest togetherness (e pluribus unum; tikkun olam; equality through diversity etc.) under the umbrella of "unity" to tempt each one of the many to ignore being apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain apartheid before being dissolved back into wholeness.
Spirit precedes words
a) sound (perceivable) precedes words (suggested); spirit represents each ones choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within sound.
b) the few suggest spiritualism (opposing materialism) to tempt each one of the many to ignore that spirit represents ones adaptation as material (form) to being (choice) within the momentum (balance) of immaterial (flow).
to understand the spirit behind becomes the SHIELD against deception through words.
a) consenting to understand (stand under) suggested spiritualism shapes the "against" conflict of reason (want vs not want aka spiritualism vs materialism aka agreement vs disagreement).
b) a suggested SHIELD, verb - "to defend against" tempts one to grow resistance "for" the sustenance of self (living) within harms way (process of dying) aka growth within loss, not growth vs growth to avoid loss aka seeking order out of chaos. The conflicts of reason simply tempt resistance to be spend against resistance, while both sides fall for the temptation to ignore resisting temptations, which would grow resistance exponentially.
c) both attack and defense represent tools of free will of choice, yet choice represents the response-ability within balance. Choose to attack or defend whatever you want or not want; but you need to adapt to balance.
A fish can describe the ocean all day and die of thirst.
Discerned to be a fish; grown comprehension about the ocean...yet failed to adapt as the former to the momentum of the latter.
I understand the difference between superstition, numerology, semantics and gematria. They can be seen as levels of understanding.
Crowley was a fine example of how such forays can lead to madness, due to the infinite complexity that unfolds. Seeking, one can find most any conjecture confirmed and this in a magician, leads to a god complex in control.
I've developed a quip 'They aren't wrong'. This insinuates that the information is 'correct' in the way presented, but is missing something vital.
100 people will see something different in any one 'clue'.
Clew: A supposed ball of yarn or thread by which one could navigate the Labyrinth. Disambiguation: Clue - origin: clew
Used in a sentence:
Knowing that the clew leads to the Minotaur, not out of the labyrinth, Daedelus fashioned wings for his son so he could fly OVER the whole grid and see it from 40,000 ft.
This carries its own warning of flying 'too close to the sun'. I see both as sister analogies of extremes in both exoteric and esoteric adventures. The clew did NOT lead out of the labyrinth and Daedalus 'realized' it. His first step towards escape. He had knowledge of the minotaur first and that was all the difference.
Forest for the trees is the modern analogy.
How and why were specific letters formed and chosen and united to form words?
Spirit of the law vs letter of the law.
Meaning is spirit not letter. Letter divides, spirit unites.
Spirit precedes words....to understand the spirit behind becomes the SHIELD against deception through words.
.A fish can describe the ocean all day and die of thirst.
https://www.scribd.com/document/398575567/230403079-Jesus-Christ-Sun-of-God-Ancient-Cosmology-and-Early-Christian-Symbolism-by-David-R-Fideler-pdf
Balance represents the level (even); choice represents the odds...understanding represents ones choice to stand under the suggested choices of others, hence imbalance.
Being in-between (inception to death) implies being differentiated (living) through sameness (process of dying). Willingly ignoring this gives others the consent to utilize suggested superstition, numerology, semantics and gematria.
...according to those suggesting his-story.
MAD, adjective - "disordered in intellect"...a) INTELLECT (Latin intelligo) - "to understand" represents standing under suggested, hence ignoring to resist the perceivable natural order, and disorder represents temporary chaos (living) to willingly ignore ongoing order (process of dying).
The few suggest intellect; intelligence; intel...to tempt the consenting many to disorder themselves by standing under suggested information.
To be (alive) implies being lead into (inception) and out of (death) temporary chaos through the ongoing natural order...so everything leads everyone back to order.
Chasing suggested information into complexity grinds ones resistance down, hence the more complex the suggested, the dumber those consenting to it, which leads to the suggested crumbling upon them based on lack of potential to utilize or maintain it.
The few suggest "civilizations; nations, and societies" as narratives to distract the many from the suggested collapsing upon them, based on their consent to want more of it. From building the tower of babel (confusion; disorder) to fallen angles (consequences of ignorant choices cascading down the pyramid).
...because living implies being directed towards death, hence seeking wanted outcomes representing less needed resistance, hence "finding" faster.
CONJECTURE, noun - "casting or throwing together"...every suggested information represents conjecture, because it implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence casting a bond between choices together.
Meanwhile; everything perceivable represents moving differences (inspiration) aka different partials being moved apart from one another.
a) the few suggest control from above to tempt the many to ignore being free (choice) at the center (balance).
b) suggested composition (more than one) tempts perceiving ones (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
c) consenting to suggested represents ignorance of being choice for submission to other choices. To distract from the contract law underneath, the few suggest control from above "in the name of", hence "e nomine"...patris (whole) et filii (partial) et spiritus sancti (adaptation of partial to whole).
a) sarcasm is being suggested to distract comedy (living) from drama (process of dying).
b) are vs aren't and right vs wrong represents reasoning over suggested, hence implying ones consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) those comprehending reasoning utilize contradiction of whatever you suggest within a conflict of reason, as to keep you reasoning, while those lacking comprehension will either fortify their side within reason with whatever you suggested or demand you to choose a side instead of questioning theirs.
a) because everyone within everything represents a different point of view.
b) Who? One! Which weapon? Choice! Where? Balance! One doesn't need suggested clues to solve anything, one needs to resist be dissolved by everything. The solution isn't hidden; those being dissolved by it, need to grow within it.
LAB, noun - "a great talker; a blabber"...hence without consenting to blabbering suggestions; the only perceivable path won't turn into a mental labyrinth of confusion.
Assistance for growth tempts ignorance of growing resistance within temptation. Hence the choice to accept (want) vs decline (not want) the suggested wings, or the need to learn to fly.
As for over the whole grid...no matter ones height, there can only be partials as far as the eye can see.
Both "sun" and "son" represent one...not the material, but partial (material) within whole (immaterial). Too close to oneself represents ignoring perceivable outside (exoteric) for suggested upheld within (esoteric)...leading nonetheless to getting burned.
a)each choice represents another first step within momentum. Each step shapes ones surrounding within everyone's path.
b) suggested escapism tempts towards outcome (dying), while ignoring the perceivable need to resist origin for prolonged sustenance (living).
Everyone has knowledge (the ability to perceive everything perceivable)..."minotaur" represents a suggested information tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration (moving differences).
a) suggesting that a forest is based upon amount of trees, when everything (loss) surrounding a forest (growth) is implied for the existence of the forest (Latin foris) - "outside".
b) ANAL'OGY, noun [Gr. ratio, proportion.] - "an agreement or likeness between things, when the things are otherwise entirely different"...each thing within everything represents a difference (a partial within whole). The agreement represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...a temptation.
a) How? Free will of choice. Why? To tempt others to submit free will of choice to suggested, which allows those suggesting to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at their free will of choice.
b) LET'TER, noun [from let.] - "one who permits", hence choice (consent) permitting choice (suggestion) to contractually bind ones choice to suggested choices, hence from being free to being set free/let off the leash at liberty by others.
PERMIT', verb [Latin permitto; per and mitto, to send.]...the process of dying sends those living within, hence balance sending choice. The few suggest POST, noun [Latin postis, positus, pono, to place.] for the many to send letters...
c) suggested UNITED; U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity] - "one" tempts the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole) for suggested togetherness with other ones.
d) a letter represents suggested symbolism (meaning attached to brand), which represents the inversion of perceivable symmetry (form within flow aka moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation as to draw comprehension from).
Setting the former (symbolism) into the latter (symmetry) contradicts the temporary form with ongoing flow. This brings one to WORD, noun [Latin , to speak; that which is uttered or thrown out.] - "a combination of articulate and vocal sounds". Now one can artificially (by suggestion) combine uttered meanings, hence mimicking ongoing change. This allows those who suggest information to adapt to those who consent to ignore inspiration.
L-A-W aka Land Air Water...constituent parts (partial form) within a composition (whole flow).
SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] - "animal exitement" aka mind agitated through animation. That implies the need to adapt as the exited (living) to the animating (process of dying), while the suggested letter represents permission by others on how to react.
Perceivable inspiration represents predefined meaning, suggesting others what "is" tempts one to ignore predefined meaning (all that was perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what is), while tempting others to exploit ignorance with suggested meaning.
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested letters shapes division (want vs not want).
b) all represents one (unit) in energy...the more the perceiving one adapts (spirit) to perceivable oneness, the more one comprehends oneness, hence being alone aka ALL(in)ONE.
c) the few suggest togetherness (e pluribus unum; tikkun olam; equality through diversity etc.) under the umbrella of "unity" to tempt each one of the many to ignore being apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain apartheid before being dissolved back into wholeness.
a) sound (perceivable) precedes words (suggested); spirit represents each ones choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within sound.
b) the few suggest spiritualism (opposing materialism) to tempt each one of the many to ignore that spirit represents ones adaptation as material (form) to being (choice) within the momentum (balance) of immaterial (flow).
a) consenting to understand (stand under) suggested spiritualism shapes the "against" conflict of reason (want vs not want aka spiritualism vs materialism aka agreement vs disagreement).
b) a suggested SHIELD, verb - "to defend against" tempts one to grow resistance "for" the sustenance of self (living) within harms way (process of dying) aka growth within loss, not growth vs growth to avoid loss aka seeking order out of chaos. The conflicts of reason simply tempt resistance to be spend against resistance, while both sides fall for the temptation to ignore resisting temptations, which would grow resistance exponentially.
c) both attack and defense represent tools of free will of choice, yet choice represents the response-ability within balance. Choose to attack or defend whatever you want or not want; but you need to adapt to balance.
Discerned to be a fish; grown comprehension about the ocean...yet failed to adapt as the former to the momentum of the latter.