Hey guys, been redpilled for a while now and have been awoken to many lies that are fed to society. However, I have never been down the flat earth rabbit hole. I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction to find some good information on the topic. Thanks
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
That’s true, they did figure it. Sadly, rather than ever checking/measuring/validating their assumption - they just went ahead and arrogantly taught it as fact to children for generations (continuing to today).
Not if the unvalidated assumption that it was spherical was wrong - no. The eratosthenes procedure/calculation absolutely requires the world to be spherical (and many other unvalidated assumptions) in order to be meaningful.
Not at all! In fact they dovetail into one another for obvious and straightforward reasons.
Not when you bother researching it thoroughly, no. It just seems simple/obvious at first glance. In part this is due to the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop that intentionally and loudly conflates the subject (and its researchers) with offensively stupid ideas. If it truly were so obvious it was all too stupid to spend any time researching or earnestly discussing - why spend so much money on loudly advertising that constantly?
If you are at all interested in the subject, including against/critical, please join us on flatearthresearch to exchange our views in further depth!
The Earth is not flat.
who said it was?
i just shared the fact that the greeks assumed the world was spherical and then taught it to children disingenuously/ erroneously as fact forever after, and that the calculations for circumference absolutely depend on that assumption to be correct.
Thank you for admitting that your entire narrative is a hoax and that the earth is not flat.
a) having a choice implies being odds (need or want) within even (balance).
b) AN'CIENT, adjective - "things subject to gradual decay"...life being moved from inception towards death represents a thing subjected to gradual decay. If one can be ancient and recent simultaneously, then what if one exists momentarily aka within ever changing momentum (balance in motion)?
c) are those who suggest his-story also those who suggest the "Greeks"? GREEK, adjective - "pertaining to Greece. [See Gray.]" + GRAY, adjective (name given to the Greeks, on account of their fair complexion) - "white, with a mixture of black; dark; of a mixed color; of the color of ashes". Who are those who are called they "gray man", who also like to mix black vs white (masonic checkerboard) together?
What was that about Greece..."cradle of civilization"...CRADLE, noun - "a movable machine of various constructions, placed on circular pieces of board, for rocking children or inform persons to sleep"...Why do the many choose to be asleep instead of awake? Who "rocks the world" of the many? Who constructed circular pieces (geocentrism) to civilize the many? Why is it that if I give a dog a name it's called domestication; yet giving a child a name makes him part of "civilization"? Why do the civilizations of the many keep crumbling, while those pesky few remain at the helm for the building of the next one?
What if living within the process of dying represent a GREEK-FIRE - "a combustible composition"? What if the few use sleight of hands for those with eyes to see like GREASE (greece) LIGHTNING (fire) aka "is automatic; It's systematic; It's hydromatic...it's grease lightning". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK63eUyk-iM
Watch out for Alexandria or you could get burned ("ALEXA...look up the library of ALEXA-ndria")...or did someone already KINDLE it?