/pol/ screencap re: 5G
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Guys, 5G alarmism is a fucking psyop.
Look up at the sky. You see that big fucking nuclear bomb going off? It dumps 1kW of pure radiational energy on every meter squared.
That 5G tower a mile away from you a fucking mouse fart in comparison to THE BUG FUCKING NUCLEAR BOMB GOING OFF IN THE SKY.
You know what's really going to wipe out everything? It's not 5G it's fucking AI.
Grow the fuck up and stop being scared about bullshit that intel ops shovel at your face to distract you from what's really happening. The biggest threat about 5G is that its going to be used as a surveillance platform to track your every move.
The idea that a weapon system disguised as a communications network can’t be used for multiple nefarious purposes is the dumbest fucking take I’ll read for a long fucking time.
Bingo!
while I disagree with you on the dangers of 5G being a psyop, the AI threat is actually a very very tightly controlled one.
the internet is basically ran by AI and chat bots (hello reddit) to steer public discourse inside a concave hull by self-adapting ML algorithms, this has been on the loose and used against the population for a long time in beta, but released in full during the 2020 hygienic panic...
You need to go to basic cell biophysics and understand the frequency windows of cell communications and their varied and specific pulse forms. They differ a lot from the constant near-steady state wide frequency radiation coming from solar and cosmic sources. Human biology has adapted and grown around the latter for a few million years (longer if you start from single cell organisms).
I suggest this as a starting point:
Markov, M.S. (Ed.). (2015). Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18148
A higher level view is offered in Levitt et al. 3-part paper series, start with paper 2:
Levitt, B. Blake, Lai, Henry C. and Manville, Albert M.. "Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: how species interact with natural and man-made EMF" Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. 37, no. 3, 2022, pp. 327-406. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0050
Come back when you are able to differentiate those from pure black body radiation and the approximation of that form the sun, and their subsequent effects on mammalian biology.
... the issue is the frequency of the radiation. The sun emits at or around light frequencies. The 60GHz of 5g is, obviously, not visibile.