I think that this website is part of a collection of websites which are own by Breitbart media as a front for controlled opposition.
It would align with the timing, the focus on their demographics, and would explain why there was a massive downvoted brigade against a post addressing some legit subversive propaganda from 13 years ago they still have up......
This place is showing its ownership structure imo....
--
Edit I have done more digging and I think it is not Breitbart but rather the Mercer Family and one of their branches. The Mercer family heavily invested in all the controlled ops on the right and has been a huge player (more than. Soros according to the following)
"According to OpenSecrets, Renaissance is the top financial firm contributing to federal campaigns in the 2016 election cycle, donating $33,108,000 by July.[46] By comparison, over that same period sixth ranked Soros Fund Management has contributed $13,238,551.[46] Renaissance's managers were also active in the 2016 cycle, contributing nearly $30 million by June, with Mercer ranking as the #1 individual federal donor, largely to Republicans, and Simons ranked #5, largely to Democrats.[47] They were top donors to the presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton[48] and Donald Trump.[49]"
Is conpro a limited hangout in your view? Genuinely curious I'm not sure what to make of the situation
In this case my use of the term limited hangout was to highlight that a lot of what is not allowed in other communities is spoken of freely there, so in trying to reconcile my understanding of your view I was curious if that was your read
I haven't seen much censorship, but moreso some forum sliding and astroturfing attempts that dissuade deeper discussion