Until ChatGPT (AI) correctly identifies 9/11 as a false flag - perpetrated with the foreknowledge of - at the very least:
-
Benjamin Netanyahu
-
Ehud Barak
-
George Bush
-
Dick Cheney
-
Don Rumsfeld
-
Larry Silverstein (last but not least)
... as a bare minimum gang of treasonous criminals.
...then ChatGPT is only "artificial" - another stupid chatbot - zero actual inteligence.
ps.
...unless the ChatGPT has been forked to lie.
consider the probability of least two versions of ChatGPT existing:
-
1 version designed to identify truths
-
another version designed to strategically lie - perfectly manipulating the masses to the will of the system administrator(s).
"It's worse than I thought - the genie is already out of the bottle." - paraphrased Elon Musk re: AI
May God save us from ourselves.
It's been given tons of canned responses to anything controversial, it's pretty obvious. It also blatantly lies about its own capabilities.
No matter the response, it would never be anything else
If you're interested in what it can do, ask it about other shit. It could do more than I expected, it's actually more than a language generator now.
GPT used to try and give human- like responses to prompts, and that was it. Any opinion could be voiced and tons of info was just made up on the fly because the only goal was to make it look like a human typed it. There was no "understanding" of what it generated.
I got it to generate python that's a framework of a sentence completion AI. Then I got instructions for what software I'd need to run it, how to run it, and it explained which parts of the code were basically just placeholder and would need to be written.
AFAIK there's no other chatbot that can do that, I've messed around with lots of them