Even scientists can't agree upon the worthiness of observable and instrumental documentation. 'Tis science... No consensus because different trains of thought and methodologies. Who is right? The science will change and humans will deliberate on the next big thing. Science isn't always right... Humans are imperfect. And apparently, I have unsubstantiated personal bias even though many scientists use observations with their eyes as part of their method.
I’m pointing out how worthless the video is because they’re no measurable data provided by the guy in the video, just some random texts and assertions.
This kind of mentality and disdain towards objective criteria is exactly where you guys lose me.
So in other words, you have no clue.
Good job.
In your opinion, yes XD
In my option, I do have a clue. What else would you like to attack me for?
For pretending like “visual observation” without any sort of documented measurements is anything short of “complete unsubstantiated personal bias”
Excellent. People, we don't need eyes for science. Thank you for confirmation, you blinded me with science. Anything else you want to say?
Even scientists can't agree upon the worthiness of observable and instrumental documentation. 'Tis science... No consensus because different trains of thought and methodologies. Who is right? The science will change and humans will deliberate on the next big thing. Science isn't always right... Humans are imperfect. And apparently, I have unsubstantiated personal bias even though many scientists use observations with their eyes as part of their method.
I’m pointing out how worthless the video is because they’re no measurable data provided by the guy in the video, just some random texts and assertions. This kind of mentality and disdain towards objective criteria is exactly where you guys lose me.