Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

16
Daylight vs Sunlight (www.bitchute.com)
posted 3 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe 3 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe +21 / -5
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– supermario2360 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Even scientists can't agree upon the worthiness of observable and instrumental documentation. 'Tis science... No consensus because different trains of thought and methodologies. Who is right? The science will change and humans will deliberate on the next big thing. Science isn't always right... Humans are imperfect. And apparently, I have unsubstantiated personal bias even though many scientists use observations with their eyes as part of their method.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– supermario2360 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

No problem. In my opinion, it is worth it to think outside the box. Everyone has been indoctrinated about space and the planets and the sun and the big bang, etc. Take a step back and maybe you can find deception/ half truths/ brainwashing. Hey 9 out of 10 scientist agree because they are paid off. The 10th scientist is discredited/ shunned/ or outright killed to keep the narrative. This may not be true in all cases... The covid conspiracists may have been right the whole time but science says "trust science and nothing else". And some of the critical hinging elements of the scientific explanation of reality are theories and not concrete repeatable fact. Theories coming from ones brain, which is not a mechanical device recording data such as a spectrophotometer. Even "gravity" varies in strength across the earth. Do we trust scientists who may or may not be taking bribes?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This video was simply proposing a theory and offering evidence and examples to show its plausibility. That is the first stage of the scientific method.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy