....must be controlled opposition. It's impossible for someone to be right on 99% of things but then, say, think JFK was killed by the Mafia when, everybody who's anybody, knows it was the CIA.
Also, anyone who didn't get everything spot on correct with their analysis must be as well. This of course, means that even someone who fell for the COVID scam, then came to their senses (even doing so really early in the scam) is controlled opposition.
Also, anybody who gets a lot of social media follows is clearly a sell out quisling. They should be relatively voiceless, like me, else they must be on the take like a dirty cop.
I'm never wrong, either, by the way. Which means I'm not controlled opposition.
Just wanted to clear that up for you all. Carry on.
In all seriousness I sometimes get the impression that "controlled opposition" is seen as an insult or an accusation of nefarious intentions, when it just literally means the person/group is to some extent / in some ways opposing XYZ but is ultimately under the control of a force in the background, some controlled opposition people actually are behaving in deliberate nefarious ways but in some cases there are people who are simply scared for their lives and/or the safety of their loved ones and so they try to walk a fine line
It's kinda like how "conspiracy theory" has been made to take on a derogatory implication when it's literally just a theory about people conspiring to do something, something that happens all over the world everyday