Sergius promulgated the belief that Jesus Christ had two natures but one will, known as Monothelitism.
So you blame the pope for following the error of the patriarch of Constantinople. Why didn’t the pope decide if he’s supreme, why did he fall into the same error?
This is the difference we view the church as the pillar of truth not any fallible man.
Popes are human too and make mistakes. Neither papal supremacy nor the Dogma of papal infallibility suggest that the pope is incapable of making mistakes. All popes have made mistakes at one time or another. Even St. Peter made mistakes: He denied Christ 3 times, plunged into the water because he doubted Christ, dared to rebuke Christ, cut off a guy's ear after being told to stand down, refused to eat with gentiles... And he is not only the first Pope but also a Saint!
Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.
Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.
1: Even in the Bible Paul corrected Peter for only hanging around former Jews. If that shows Peter has the power alone to settle disagreements then you’ve got a problem.
2: Rome has appealed to other patriarchates for settling disputes. Rome wasn’t the appellate court, it was one of the patriarchates that you could appeal to.
You keep conflating "settling issues" with "fraternal rebuking". Those 2 things are not the same. You may want to look up what each of those things actually means.
Yeah, well, tell that to Pope St. Leo the Great who flatly rejected Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon. Your beloved Patriarch of Constantinople was put in his place. Cope.
No, he was anathematized for allowing Sergius's heresy.
Monothelitism was never formally taught by Rome.
Sergius promulgated the belief that Jesus Christ had two natures but one will, known as Monothelitism.
So you blame the pope for following the error of the patriarch of Constantinople. Why didn’t the pope decide if he’s supreme, why did he fall into the same error?
This is the difference we view the church as the pillar of truth not any fallible man.
Popes are human too and make mistakes. Neither papal supremacy nor the Dogma of papal infallibility suggest that the pope is incapable of making mistakes. All popes have made mistakes at one time or another. Even St. Peter made mistakes: He denied Christ 3 times, plunged into the water because he doubted Christ, dared to rebuke Christ, cut off a guy's ear after being told to stand down, refused to eat with gentiles... And he is not only the first Pope but also a Saint!
Someone in the Church has to settle disagreements. This was the role that Christ gave to Peter alone.
1: Even in the Bible Paul corrected Peter for only hanging around former Jews. If that shows Peter has the power alone to settle disagreements then you’ve got a problem.
2: Rome has appealed to other patriarchates for settling disputes. Rome wasn’t the appellate court, it was one of the patriarchates that you could appeal to.
You keep conflating "settling issues" with "fraternal rebuking". Those 2 things are not the same. You may want to look up what each of those things actually means.
Yeah, well, tell that to Pope St. Leo the Great who flatly rejected Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon. Your beloved Patriarch of Constantinople was put in his place. Cope.